Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Mental Health of Young People in Australia: Key Findings from the Child and Adolescent Component of the National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being
2001654 citationsMichael G. Sawyer, Fiona Arney et al.Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Fiona Arney's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fiona Arney with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fiona Arney more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fiona Arney. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fiona Arney. The network helps show where Fiona Arney may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fiona Arney
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fiona Arney.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fiona Arney based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Fiona Arney. Fiona Arney is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mathews, Ben, Kerryann Walsh, Michael Dunne, et al.. (2016). Scoping study for research into prevalence of child sexual abuse in Australia.1 indexed citations
6.
McLean, Sara, et al.. (2013). Maintaining connectedness: Family contact for children in statutory residential care in South Australia. 7(1). 63.3 indexed citations
7.
Arney, Fiona, et al.. (2010). 'Mental Health Is One Issue. The Child Is Another Issue. Issues Bounce Back and Clash Against Each Other': Facilitating Collaboration between Child Protection and Mental Health Services. 5(1). 21.3 indexed citations
8.
Arney, Fiona, et al.. (2009). In the Best Interests of the Child?: Determining the Effects of the Emergency Intervention on Child Safety and Wellbeing. 27(2). 42.2 indexed citations
Daniel, Brigid, et al.. (2009). How is the concept of resilience operationalised in practice with vulnerable children. Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University). 12(1). 2–21.3 indexed citations
Lewig, Kerry, Fiona Arney, & Dorothy Scott. (2006). Closing the research-policy and research-practice gaps : ideas for child and family services.. Family matters. 12.25 indexed citations
13.
Arney, Fiona, et al.. (2006). Sowing the Seeds of Innovation: Ideas for Child and Family Services. Family matters. 38.15 indexed citations
Sawyer, Michael G., Fiona Arney, Peter Baghurst, et al.. (2001). The Mental Health of Young People in Australia: Key Findings from the Child and Adolescent Component of the National Survey of Mental Health and Well-Being. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 35(6). 806–814.654 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Sawyer, Michael & Fiona Arney. (2000). Depression in childhood. 41(9). 53–59.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.