Countries citing papers authored by Fintan Costello
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Fintan Costello's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fintan Costello with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fintan Costello more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fintan Costello. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fintan Costello. The network helps show where Fintan Costello may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fintan Costello
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fintan Costello.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fintan Costello based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Fintan Costello. Fintan Costello is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Costello, Fintan, et al.. (2017). Probability judgement from samples: accurate estimates and the conjunction fallacy.. Cognitive Science.1 indexed citations
Costello, Fintan, et al.. (2014). On fallacies and normative reasoning: when people's judgements follow probability theory.. Cognitive Science. 36(36).8 indexed citations
9.
Nulty, Paul & Fintan Costello. (2010). UCD-PN: Selecting General Paraphrases Using Conditional Probability. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 234–237.6 indexed citations
10.
Costello, Fintan, et al.. (2006). An Analysis of the CARIN Model of Conceptual Combination. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28).1 indexed citations
11.
Costello, Fintan & Barry Devereux. (2006). Modeling the Interpretation and Interpretation Ease of Noun-Noun Compounds Using a Relation Space Approach to Compound Meaning. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 28(28).3 indexed citations
12.
Costello, Fintan & Barry Devereux. (2005). Propane Stoves and Gas Lamps: How the Concept Hierarchy Influences the Interpretation of Noun-Noun Compounds. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 27(27).3 indexed citations
13.
Costello, Fintan. (2005). A Unified Account of Conjunction and Disjunction Fallacies in People's Judgments of Likelihood. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 27(27).3 indexed citations
Costello, Fintan, Zachary Estes, Christina L. Gagné, & Edward J. Wisniewski. (2004). The Diversity of Conceptual Combination. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 26(26).1 indexed citations
17.
Devereux, Barry & Fintan Costello. (2004). Learning relations between concepts: classification and conceptual combination. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 26(26).2 indexed citations
18.
Costello, Fintan. (2002). Investigating creative language: People’s choice of words in the production of novel noun-noun compounds. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 24(24).7 indexed citations
19.
Costello, Fintan. (2000). An Exemplar Model of Classification in Single and Combined Categories. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 22(22).1 indexed citations
20.
Costello, Fintan & Mark T. Keane. (1996). Polysemy in Conceptual Combination: Testing the Constraint Theory of Combination. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology).20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.