Mark T. Keane

4.9k total citations
109 papers, 2.6k citations indexed

About

Mark T. Keane is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark T. Keane has authored 109 papers receiving a total of 2.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 56 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 17 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 10 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Mark T. Keane's work include Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (15 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (12 papers) and AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (11 papers). Mark T. Keane is often cited by papers focused on Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (15 papers), Cognitive Science and Mapping (12 papers) and AI-based Problem Solving and Planning (11 papers). Mark T. Keane collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United States and United Kingdom. Mark T. Keane's co-authors include Martin Halvey, Barry Smyth, K. J. Gilhooly, Fintan Costello, Eoin M. Kenny, Michael W. Eysenck, Louise Connell, Rebecca Maguire, Phil Maguire and Ramón López de Mántaras and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Communications of the ACM and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Mark T. Keane

99 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark T. Keane Ireland 27 1.0k 473 384 333 280 109 2.6k
Mary Lou Maher United States 33 959 0.9× 468 1.0× 185 0.5× 184 0.6× 308 1.1× 209 3.5k
Patrick Henry Winston United States 18 1.3k 1.3× 343 0.7× 368 1.0× 345 1.0× 182 0.7× 69 2.9k
Darrell Laham United States 9 2.4k 2.3× 363 0.8× 461 1.2× 596 1.8× 752 2.7× 11 4.0k
Scott Douglass United States 12 963 0.9× 347 0.7× 758 2.0× 374 1.1× 107 0.4× 45 2.3k
Gerald DeJong United States 20 1.8k 1.7× 560 1.2× 298 0.8× 896 2.7× 247 0.9× 78 3.5k
Antal van den Bosch Netherlands 31 2.5k 2.4× 262 0.6× 342 0.9× 276 0.8× 667 2.4× 240 3.5k
Michael D. Byrne United States 27 1.3k 1.3× 479 1.0× 1.1k 2.8× 483 1.5× 345 1.2× 112 3.9k
Ron Sun United States 28 1.6k 1.5× 404 0.9× 898 2.3× 455 1.4× 96 0.3× 122 3.0k
Robert Dale Australia 34 3.8k 3.6× 404 0.9× 448 1.2× 301 0.9× 481 1.7× 187 5.3k
Ewan Klein United Kingdom 24 3.6k 3.4× 636 1.3× 273 0.7× 322 1.0× 624 2.2× 92 5.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark T. Keane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark T. Keane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark T. Keane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark T. Keane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark T. Keane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark T. Keane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark T. Keane. The network helps show where Mark T. Keane may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark T. Keane

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark T. Keane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark T. Keane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark T. Keane. Mark T. Keane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cassens, Jörg, et al.. (2021). Explanation in Human Thinking. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. 43(43). 1 indexed citations
2.
Kenny, Eoin M., et al.. (2021). Bayesian Case-Exclusion and Explainable AI (XAI) for Sustainable Farming. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology). 3 indexed citations
3.
Aggarwal, Manish, M. Hanmandlu, Mark T. Keane, & Kanad K. Biswas. (2018). Intuitionistic Fuzzy Logit Model of Discrete Choice. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computational Intelligence. 3(1). 85–89. 2 indexed citations
4.
Keane, Mark T., et al.. (2016). Helping News Editors Write Better Headlines: A Recommender to Improve the Keyword Contents and Shareability of News Headlines. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology). 2 indexed citations
5.
Leavy, Susan, et al.. (2016). Mining the Cultural Memory of Irish Industrial Schools Using Word Embedding and Text Classification. Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin). 1 indexed citations
6.
Renwick, Alan, et al.. (2015). 89th AES Annual Conference Programme, Warwick, 2015. Journal of Agricultural Economics. 66(3). 852–857. 3 indexed citations
7.
Keane, Mark T., Jeffrey Loewenstein, Phil Maguire, et al.. (2014). Triangulating Surprise: Expectations, Uncertainty, and Making Sense. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology). 36(36). 70–71. 1 indexed citations
8.
Maguire, Phil, et al.. (2013). A Computational Theory of Subjective Probability [Featuring a Proof that the Conjunction Effect is not a Fallacy]. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology). 35(35). 5 indexed citations
9.
Keane, Mark T., et al.. (2013). Surprise: Youve got some explaining to do. arXiv (Cornell University). 35(35). 7 indexed citations
10.
O’Donoghue, Diarmuid & Mark T. Keane. (2012). A Creative Analogy Machine: Results and Challenges. Maynooth University ePrints and eTheses Archive (Maynooth University). 17–24. 4 indexed citations
11.
Keane, Mark T., et al.. (2007). An energy-efficient, multi-agent sensor network for detecting diffuse events. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1390–1395. 14 indexed citations
12.
Keane, Mark T., et al.. (2005). How Understanding Novel Compounds is Facilitated by Priming from Similar, Known Compounds. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 27(27). 5 indexed citations
13.
Church, Karen, Mark T. Keane, & Barry Smyth. (2005). Towards more intelligent mobile search. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1675–1677. 5 indexed citations
14.
Keane, Mark T., et al.. (2004). Role swapping in multi-agent sensor webs. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1055–1056. 1 indexed citations
15.
Lynott, Dermot & Mark T. Keane. (2004). A Model of Novel Compound Production. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 26(26).
16.
Lynott, Dermot & Mark T. Keane. (2003). The Role of Knowledge Support in Creating Noun-Noun Compounds. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 25(25). 746–751. 7 indexed citations
17.
Keane, Mark T., et al.. (2001). Similarity Processing Depends on the Similarities Present: Effects of Relational Prominence in Similarity and Analogical Processing. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 23(23). 3 indexed citations
18.
Eysenck, Michael W. & Mark T. Keane. (2000). Resources for teaching cognitive psychology : supplementary material for congnitive psychology a student's handbook, 4th edition [by] Michael W. Eysenck, Mark T. Keane. Psychology Press eBooks. 4 indexed citations
19.
Veale, Tony & Mark T. Keane. (1992). Conceptual scaffolding: using metaphors to build knowledge structures. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 174–178. 2 indexed citations
20.
Keane, Mark T.. (1988). Where's the Beef? The Absence of Pragmatic Factors in Pragmatic Theories of Analogy.. European Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 327–332. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026