Fernando Espósito

454 total citations
13 papers, 81 citations indexed

About

Fernando Espósito is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Urban Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Fernando Espósito has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 81 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 1 paper in Political Science and International Relations and 1 paper in Urban Studies. Recurrent topics in Fernando Espósito's work include Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (4 papers), Latin American Urban Studies (1 paper) and Historical and Environmental Studies (1 paper). Fernando Espósito is often cited by papers focused on Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (4 papers), Latin American Urban Studies (1 paper) and Historical and Environmental Studies (1 paper). Fernando Espósito collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Brazil and Chile. Fernando Espósito's co-authors include Anselm Doering-Manteuffel and Sven Reichardt and has published in prestigious journals such as History and Theory, German History and Modernism/modernity.

In The Last Decade

Fernando Espósito

10 papers receiving 59 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Fernando Espósito Germany	5	43	19	7	5	5	13	81
Walter Reese-Schäfer Germany	5	28 0.7×	15 0.8×	2 0.3×	3 0.6×	3 0.6×	25	60
Andreas Anter Germany	5	60 1.4×	34 1.8×	2 0.3×	4 0.8×	3 0.6×	20	85
Gary Browning United Kingdom	5	25 0.6×	19 1.0×	2 0.3×	3 0.6×		20	48
Angelika Poferl Germany	6	45 1.0×	23 1.2×	5 0.7×	1 0.2×	3 0.6×	16	75
André Brodocz Germany	7	39 0.9×	29 1.5×	10 1.4×	3 0.6×	1 0.2×	19	77
Alan McPherson United States	6	45 1.0×	33 1.7×	2 0.3×	4 0.8×	1 0.2×	26	85
Yair Wallach United Kingdom	5	62 1.4×	19 1.0×		2 0.4×		11	80
Yasmeen Arif India	4	35 0.8×	16 0.8×		3 0.6×	2 0.4×	10	52
Mortimer Sellers United States	8	31 0.7×	51 2.7×	3 0.4×	7 1.4×	1 0.2×	22	98
M. Joel Voss United States	4	33 0.8×	31 1.6×	2 0.3×	4 0.8×		7	50

Countries citing papers authored by Fernando Espósito

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Fernando Espósito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fernando Espósito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fernando Espósito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Fernando Espósito

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fernando Espósito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fernando Espósito. The network helps show where Fernando Espósito may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fernando Espósito

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fernando Espósito. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fernando Espósito based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fernando Espósito. Fernando Espósito is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

13 of 13 papers shown

1.

Espósito, Fernando. (2024). WHY STILL KOSELLECK?. History and Theory. 64(1). 123–134.

2.

Espósito, Fernando, et al.. (2023). THE TIME OF POLITICS, THE POLITICS OF TIME, AND POLITICIZED TIME: AN INTRODUCTION TO CHRONOPOLITICS. History and Theory. 62(4). 3–23. 6 indexed citations

3.

Espósito, Fernando. (2023). PEASANTS, BRIGANDS, AND THE CHRONOPOLITICS OF THE NEW LEVIATHAN IN THE MEZZOGIORNO. History and Theory. 62(4). 24–44. 1 indexed citations

4.

Espósito, Fernando, et al.. (2021). Urbanismo de proximidad en Barcelona. Una ciudad saludable a 15 minutos del hogar. 4 indexed citations

5.

Espósito, Fernando. (2021). 2. DESPITE SINGULARITY: THE EVENT AND ITS MANIFOLD STRUCTURES OF REPETITION. History and Theory. 60(1). 86–101. 2 indexed citations

6.

Doering-Manteuffel, Anselm, et al.. (2017). Die Zukunft des 20. Jahrhunderts : Dimensionen einer historischen Zukunftsforschung. 9 indexed citations

7.

Espósito, Fernando. (2017). Die Entdeckung der Zukunft. German History. 35(2). 316–317. 40 indexed citations

8.

Espósito, Fernando. (2017). "Posthistoire" oder : Die Schließung der Zukunft und die Öffnung der Zeit. 279–301.

9.

Doering-Manteuffel, Anselm, et al.. (2016). Borders and frontiers in global and transnational history.

10.

Espósito, Fernando & Sven Reichardt. (2015). Revolution and Eternity. Introductory Remarks on Fascist Temporalities. Journal of Modern European History. 13(1). 24–43. 6 indexed citations

11.

Espósito, Fernando. (2015). Fascism, Aviation and Mythical Modernity. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. 8 indexed citations

12.

Espósito, Fernando. (2012). In "the shadow of the winged machine...": The Esposizione dell'aeronautica Italiana and the Ascension of Myth in the Slipstream of Modernity. Modernism/modernity. 19(1). 139–152. 3 indexed citations

13.

Espósito, Fernando. (2011). Mythische Moderne. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag eBooks. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact