Ferah Çalışır
About
In The Last Decade
Ferah Çalışır
2 papers receiving 301 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Information Systems and Management 224
- Management Information Systems 185
- Sociology and Political Science 67
- Strategy and Management 45
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 35
Countries citing papers authored by Ferah Çalışır
This map shows the geographic impact of Ferah Çalışır's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ferah Çalışır with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ferah Çalışır more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ferah Çalışır
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ferah Çalışır. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ferah Çalışır. The network helps show where Ferah Çalışır may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ferah Çalışır
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ferah Çalışır. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ferah Çalışır based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ferah Çalışır. Ferah Çalışır is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 336 | |
| 3 | An Archaeometric Study on Ancient Iznik Ceramics | 0 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.