Feng‐Ping Zhang

687 citations
36 papers · 499 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Feng‐Ping Zhang

34 papers receiving 491 citations

Peers

Feng‐Ping Zhang
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 213
  • Plant Science 302
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 72
  • Global and Planetary Change 87
  • Insect Science 45
Replace Hanna Skubatz with:
Hanna Skubatz United States
Luz Calvo-Irabién Mexico
Shiva Devkota Nepal
Charlotte Sletten Bjorå Norway
Rosa Sánchez‐Lucas Spain
William A. Hoch United States
Παναγιώτα Καραγεώργου Greece
Tuula Puhakainen Finland
Sheila Chiwocha Canada
Feng‐Ping Zhang relative to Hanna Skubatz United States Hanna Skubatz's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Hanna Skubatz · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Feng‐Ping Zhang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Feng‐Ping Zhang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Feng‐Ping Zhang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Feng‐Ping Zhang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Feng‐Ping Zhang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Feng‐Ping Zhang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Feng‐Ping Zhang. The network helps show where Feng‐Ping Zhang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Feng‐Ping Zhang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Feng‐Ping Zhang Line = papers co-authored together Feng‐Ping Zhang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201884
2 201843
3 201134
4 201733
5 201732
6 201731
7 201625
8 201422
9 201620
10 202219
11 202019
12 202114
13 201912
14
A species of fig tree and three unrelated fig wasp pollinators
200812
15 202012
16 201211
17 201610
18 20239
19 20088
20 20158

About Feng‐Ping Zhang

Feng‐Ping Zhang is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Organic Chemistry, having authored 36 papers that have together received 499 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (23 papers), Plant Parasitism and Resistance (10 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (7 papers), Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (4 papers), Plant Reproductive Biology (4 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (4 papers) and Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (213 citations), Plant Science (302 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (72 citations), Global and Planetary Change (87 citations) and Insect Science (45 citations). Feng‐Ping Zhang has collaborated with scholars based in China, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Timothy J. Brodribb, Shi‐Bao Zhang, Amanda Á. Cardoso, Qiuyun Yang, Frances C. Sussmilch, Scott A. M. McAdam, David S. Nichols, Gang Wang, Hong Hu and Da‐Rong Yang. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Plant Science, Plant Signaling & Behavior, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, New Phytologist and Plant Diversity.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact