Felix Joos

513 citations
46 papers · 180 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Felix Joos

40 papers receiving 171 citations

Peers

Felix Joos
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 106
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 137
  • Geometry and Topology 51
  • Mathematical Physics 22
  • Statistics and Probability 12
Replace Agelos Georgakopoulos with:
Agelos Georgakopoulos United Kingdom
Alfredo Donno Italy
Iain Moffatt United Kingdom
Sherry H.F. Yan China
Franco Saliola Canada
Julia Böttcher United Kingdom
Jakob Jönsson Sweden
Juanjo Rué Spain
Kevin O’Bryant United States
Marni Mishna Canada
Felix Joos relative to Agelos Georgakopoulos United Kingdom Agelos Georgakopoulos's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Agelos Georgakopoulos · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Felix Joos

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felix Joos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felix Joos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felix Joos more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felix Joos

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felix Joos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felix Joos. The network helps show where Felix Joos may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside Felix Joos, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Felix Joos Line = papers co-authored together Felix Joos links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202024
2 201915
3 201415
4 201911
5 20209
6 20188
7 20158
8 20158
9 20168
10 20176
11
20205
12 20175
13 20145
14 20165
15 20204
16 20144
17 20174
18 20173
19 20153
20 20163

About Felix Joos

Felix Joos is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics, Geometry and Topology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Mathematical Physics, having authored 46 papers that have together received 180 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Graph Theory Research (33 papers), Limits and Structures in Graph Theory (33 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (16 papers), Graph theory and applications (10 papers), Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems (9 papers), graph theory and CDMA systems (9 papers), Advanced Topology and Set Theory (4 papers) and Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (106 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (137 citations), Geometry and Topology (51 citations), Mathematical Physics (22 citations) and Statistics and Probability (12 citations). Felix Joos has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Jaehoon Kim, Dieter Rautenbach, Stefan Glock, Henning Bruhn, Will Perkins, Guillem Perarnau, Daniela Kühn, Deryk Osthus, Bruce Reed and Uéverton S. Souza. Their work appears in journals such as SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, Journal of Graph Theory, Journal of Combinatorial Theory Series B, Discrete Mathematics and Discrete Applied Mathematics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact