Felix Gervits
- Neurology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Social Psychology
- Rehabilitation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Roy H. HamiltonMatthias ScheutzMurray GrossmanH. Branch CoslettVaughn E. BryantAdam J. WoodsPriyanka P. Shah‐BasakRachel Wurzman
- Topics
- Speech and dialogue systems (9 papers)Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (6 papers)Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Felix Gervits
22 papers receiving 304 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Neurology 169
- Cognitive Neuroscience 147
- Artificial Intelligence 68
- Social Psychology 53
- Rehabilitation 52
Countries citing papers authored by Felix Gervits
This map shows the geographic impact of Felix Gervits's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felix Gervits with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felix Gervits more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Felix Gervits
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felix Gervits. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felix Gervits. The network helps show where Felix Gervits may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Felix Gervits
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Felix Gervits. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Felix Gervits based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Felix Gervits. Felix Gervits is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | Towards a Conversation-Analytic Taxonomy of Speech Overlap. | 3 |
| 7 | Dialogue Structure Annotation for Multi-Floor Interaction | 10 |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | The Pragmatic Parliament: A Framework for Socially-Appropriate Utterance Selection in Artificial Agents. | 10 |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | Intentionality and the Role of Labels in Categorization. | 4 |
| 16 | Disfluent but effective? A quantitative study of disfluencies and conversational moves in team discourse | 5 |
| 17 | 49 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 59 |
About Felix Gervits
Felix Gervits is a scholar working on Neurology, Artificial Intelligence and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Speech and dialogue systems (9 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (6 papers) and Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (169 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (147 citations) and Rehabilitation (52 citations). Felix Gervits has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Roy H. Hamilton, Matthias Scheutz, Murray Grossman, H. Branch Coslett, Vaughn E. Bryant, Adam J. Woods, Priyanka P. Shah‐Basak, Rachel Wurzman, Kathleen M. Eberhard and Sharon Ash. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Cognitive Science and Frontiers in Human Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.