Felix Distel

535 total citations
16 papers, 163 citations indexed

About

Felix Distel is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Felix Distel has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 163 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Artificial Intelligence, 9 papers in Computational Theory and Mathematics and 4 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Felix Distel's work include Semantic Web and Ontologies (14 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (6 papers) and Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (5 papers). Felix Distel is often cited by papers focused on Semantic Web and Ontologies (14 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (6 papers) and Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (5 papers). Felix Distel collaborates with scholars based in Germany, France and Iran. Felix Distel's co-authors include Barış Sertkaya, Rafael Peñaloza, Stefan Borgwardt, Uwe Ryssel, Yue Ma, George Tsatsaronis, Franz Baader, Michael Schroeder, Peggy Cellier and Bernhard Ganter and has published in prestigious journals such as Artificial Intelligence, Lecture notes in computer science and Discrete Applied Mathematics.

In The Last Decade

Felix Distel

16 papers receiving 134 citations

Peers

Felix Distel

AI

CTM

MB

IS

SP

Barış Sertkaya Germany

Ondřej Kuželka Czechia

Renata Wassermann Brazil

Oliver Ray United Kingdom

Dorel Lucanu Romania

Edward Hermann Hæusler Brazil

Olivier Ridoux France

Adriana Compagnoni United States

Thierry Charnois France

Shan-Hwei Nienhuys-Cheng Netherlands

Barış Sertkaya Germany

Felix Distel

143 ×1.1

AI

73 ×0.7

CTM

40 ×0.9

MB

51 ×1.4

IS

22 ×1.5

SP

Citations per year, relative to Felix Distel Felix Distel (= 1×) peers Barış Sertkaya

Countries citing papers authored by Felix Distel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Felix Distel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Felix Distel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Felix Distel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Felix Distel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Felix Distel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Felix Distel. The network helps show where Felix Distel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Felix Distel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Felix Distel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Felix Distel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Felix Distel. Felix Distel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

1.

Distel, Felix, et al.. (2016). Axiomatisation of general concept inclusions from finite interpretations. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics. 26(1). 1–46. 7 indexed citations

2.

Ma, Yue, et al.. (2015). Formalizing biomedical concepts from textual definitions. Journal of Biomedical Semantics. 6(1). 22–22. 11 indexed citations

3.

Borgwardt, Stefan, Felix Distel, & Rafael Peñaloza. (2014). Decidable Gödel description logics without the finitely-valued model property. BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca). 228–237. 10 indexed citations

4.

Borgwardt, Stefan, Felix Distel, & Rafael Peñaloza. (2014). The limits of decidability in fuzzy description logics with general concept inclusions. Artificial Intelligence. 218. 23–55. 26 indexed citations

5.

Borgwardt, Stefan, Felix Distel, & Rafael Peñaloza. (2014). Gödel Description Logics with General Models. View. 1193. 391–403. 1 indexed citations

6.

Tsatsaronis, George, et al.. (2013). Learning Formal Definitions for Biomedical Concepts.. 5 indexed citations

7.

Ryssel, Uwe, et al.. (2013). Fast algorithms for implication bases and attribute exploration using proper premises. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence. 70(1-2). 25–53. 18 indexed citations

8.

Ma, Yue & Felix Distel. (2013). Concept adjustment for description logics. 65–72. 3 indexed citations

9.

Cellier, Peggy, Felix Distel, & Bernhard Ganter. (2013). Formal Concept Analysis. Lecture notes in computer science. 4 indexed citations

10.

Borgwardt, Stefan, Felix Distel, & Rafael Peñaloza. (2012). Gödel Negation Makes Unwitnessed Consistency Crisp.. BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca). 5 indexed citations

11.

Distel, Felix. (2012). Adapting Fuzzy Formal Concept Analysis for Fuzzy Description Logics. 163–174. 2 indexed citations

12.

Distel, Felix & Barış Sertkaya. (2011). On the complexity of enumerating pseudo-intents. Discrete Applied Mathematics. 159(6). 450–466. 36 indexed citations

13.

Distel, Felix, et al.. (2011). Mining of EL-GCIs. 1083–1090. 7 indexed citations

14.

Ryssel, Uwe, et al.. (2011). Fast Computation of Proper Premises.. 100–113. 6 indexed citations

15.

Distel, Felix. (2010). Learning Description Logic Knowledge Bases from Data Using Methods from Formal Concept Analysis. Qucosa (Saxon State and University Library Dresden). 20 indexed citations

16.

Distel, Felix. (2009). Model-Based Most Specific Concepts in Some Inexpressive Description Logics.. Description Logics. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact