Paul Elzinga

17 papers receiving 145 citations

Peers

Paul Elzinga
Comparison fields: 5 of 34
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 65
  • Signal Processing 29
  • Information Systems 57
  • General Social Sciences 8
  • Artificial Intelligence 65
Replace Peter Schachte with:
Peter Schachte Australia
Nicholas Andrews United States
Stephen Weeks United States
Yannick Toussaint France
Ajith Ramanathan United States
Mira Belenkiy United States
Benoît Vaillant France
Jun'ichi Tsujii Japan
Francesca Scozzari Italy
Hyun Duk Kim United States
Paul Elzinga relative to Peter Schachte Australia Peter Schachte's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Peter Schachte · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Elzinga

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Elzinga's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Elzinga with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Elzinga more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Elzinga

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Elzinga. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Elzinga. The network helps show where Paul Elzinga may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside Paul Elzinga, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Paul Elzinga Line = papers co-authored together Paul Elzinga links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 201025
2 201022
3 201221
4 201114
5 200912
6 201011
7 201210
8
Retrieval of criminal trajectories with an FCA-based approach
20138
9 20105
10 20105
11 20094
12
Formalizing the concepts of crimes and criminals
20113
13 20093
14
Concept relation discovery and innovation enabling technology
20113
15
Maximizing classifier utility for a given accuracy
20082
16
Detecting domestic violence
20091
17 20101

About Paul Elzinga

Paul Elzinga is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Molecular Biology and Signal Processing, having authored 17 papers that have together received 150 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic (10 papers), Data Mining Algorithms and Applications (6 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (4 papers), Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies (4 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (2 papers), Data Management and Algorithms (2 papers), Time Series Analysis and Forecasting (1 paper) and Advanced Text Analysis Techniques (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (65 citations), Signal Processing (29 citations), Information Systems (57 citations), General Social Sciences (8 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (65 citations). Paul Elzinga has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Jonas Poelmans, Guido Dedene, Stijn Viaene, Karl Wolff, Marc M. Van Hulle, Dmitry I. Ignatov, Sergei O. Kuznetsov, Stephan Raaijmakers and Wessel Kraaij. Their work appears in journals such as Expert Systems with Applications, International Journal of General Systems, Applied Soft Computing, Intelligent systems in accounting, finance and management and UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact