Raymond E. Peck
- Paleontology top 5%
- Oceanography
- Atmospheric Science
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Earth-Surface Processes
- Co-authors
- Richard M. ForesterWilliam W. Craig
- Topics
- Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (8 papers)Plant Diversity and Evolution (6 papers)Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Raymond E. Peck
16 papers receiving 135 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Paleontology 122
- Oceanography 48
- Atmospheric Science 45
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 34
- Earth-Surface Processes 33
Countries citing papers authored by Raymond E. Peck
This map shows the geographic impact of Raymond E. Peck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Raymond E. Peck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Raymond E. Peck more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Raymond E. Peck
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Raymond E. Peck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Raymond E. Peck. The network helps show where Raymond E. Peck may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Raymond E. Peck
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Raymond E. Peck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Raymond E. Peck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Raymond E. Peck. Raymond E. Peck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | New name for the comatulid Semiometra minuta Peck and Watkins | 1 |
| 3 | On the systematic position of the umbellids | 7 |
| 4 | Applinocrinus, a new genus of Cretaceous microcrinoids and its distribution in North America | 22 |
| 5 | Comatulid crinoids from the lower Cretaceous of Texas | 11 |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | Pennsylvanian, Permian, and Triassic Charophyta of North America | 12 |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | Lower Cretaceous Nonmarine Ostracods and Charophytes of Wyoming and Adjacent Areas | 6 |
| 10 | Stratigraphic Distribution of Charophyta and Nonmarine Ostracods | 5 |
| 11 | Rocky Mountain Mesozoic and Cenozoic Nonmarine Microfossils | 5 |
| 12 | CRETACEOUS MICROCRINOIDS FROM ENGLAND | 26 |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | A new ostracode genus from the Cretaceous Bear River Formation [Wyoming] | 3 |
| 15 | Octocrinus Peck and Tytthocrinus Weller, synonyms of Amphipsalidocrinus Weller | 3 |
| 16 | Nonmarine ostracodes; the subfamily Cyprideinae in the Rocky Mountain area | 20 |
About Raymond E. Peck
Raymond E. Peck is a scholar working on Paleontology, Oceanography and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 16 papers that have together received 168 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (8 papers), Plant Diversity and Evolution (6 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Paleontology (122 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (33 citations) and Geology (22 citations). Raymond E. Peck has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard M. Forester and William W. Craig. Their work appears in journals such as The Botanical Review, Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology and Journal of Paleontology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.