Federico Dagna

20 papers receiving 291 citations

Peers

Federico Dagna
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
  • Otorhinolaryngology 109
  • Sensory Systems 67
  • Speech and Hearing 39
  • Neurology 39
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 62
Replace Marek Rogowski with:
Marek Rogowski Poland
Onur Çelįk Türkiye
Ömer Tarık Selçuk Türkiye
Emre Ocak Türkiye
Recep Karamert Türkiye
Ruben Hermann France
Andrea Colizza Italy
Davide Brotto Italy
Heng‐Wai Yuen Singapore
T. Just Germany
Federico Dagna relative to Marek Rogowski Poland Marek Rogowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Marek Rogowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Federico Dagna

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Federico Dagna's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federico Dagna with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federico Dagna more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Federico Dagna

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federico Dagna. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federico Dagna. The network helps show where Federico Dagna may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Federico Dagna, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Federico Dagna Line = papers co-authored together Federico Dagna links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2016131
2
Ossicular chain lesions in cholesteatoma.
201233
3 201523
4 201317
5 201414
6 201113
7 200911
8 201510
9 20139
10 20159
11 20198
12 20188
13 20167
14 20147
15
Diagnostic and therapeutic iter in paediatric OSAS: personal experience.
20115
16 20133
17 20192
18 20151
19
[Non-auditory effects of noise].
20121
20 20181

About Federico Dagna

Federico Dagna is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Otorhinolaryngology, Speech and Hearing and Physiology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 313 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (8 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (8 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (7 papers), Noise Effects and Management (3 papers), Voice and Speech Disorders (3 papers), Tracheal and airway disorders (3 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (3 papers) and Head and Neck Anomalies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Otorhinolaryngology (109 citations), Sensory Systems (67 citations), Speech and Hearing (39 citations), Neurology (39 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (62 citations). Federico Dagna has collaborated with scholars based in Italy and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Roberto Albera, Domenico Cuda, Alessandra Murri, Andrea Canale, Michelangelo Lacilla, Andrea Albera, Claudia Cassandro, Ferdinando Rossi, Daniela Carulli and A Cavalot. Their work appears in journals such as European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Annals of Otology Rhinology & Laryngology, International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology, Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica and The Laryngoscope.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact