Federica Moffa
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Reproductive Medicine top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- Isabelle DemeestereSophie TsépélidisFabienne DevrekerPhilippe SimonAlina FersterAnne DelbaereM MassobrioLaurence Dedeken
- Topics
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility (12 papers)Ovarian function and disorders (8 papers)Renal and related cancers (5 papers)
In The Last Decade
Federica Moffa
16 papers receiving 711 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 554
- Reproductive Medicine 533
- Molecular Biology 217
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 104
- Surgery 62
Countries citing papers authored by Federica Moffa
This map shows the geographic impact of Federica Moffa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Federica Moffa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Federica Moffa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Federica Moffa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Federica Moffa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Federica Moffa. The network helps show where Federica Moffa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Federica Moffa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Federica Moffa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Federica Moffa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Federica Moffa. Federica Moffa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 263 | |
| 4 | 119 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 69 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 54 | |
| 13 | 62 | |
| 14 | 34 | |
| 15 | Observations on surgical anatomy for rectal cancer surgery. | 31 |
| 16 | [Acute suppurative thyroiditis. Report of a case and review of the literature]. | 1 |
About Federica Moffa
Federica Moffa is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 744 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (12 papers), Ovarian function and disorders (8 papers) and Renal and related cancers (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (533 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (554 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (104 citations). Federica Moffa has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Belgium and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Isabelle Demeestere, Sophie Tsépélidis, Fabienne Devreker, Philippe Simon, Alina Ferster, Anne Delbaere, M Massobrio, Laurence Dedeken, Cécile Brachet and Alberto Revelli. Their work appears in journals such as Endocrine Reviews, Human Reproduction and Fertility and Sterility.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.