Farshid Navissi
- Accounting top 1%
- Strategy and Management top 2%
- Finance top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Management Information Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- Vic NaikerDan S. DhaliwalMehdi KhedmatiEdwin KiaYang LimRobert W. FaffCameron TruongFerdinand A. GulKeryn Chalmers
- Topics
- Corporate Finance and Governance (24 papers)Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (24 papers)Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (16 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaNew ZealandUnited States
In The Last Decade
Farshid Navissi
30 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Accounting 1.2k
- Strategy and Management 627
- Finance 226
- Economics and Econometrics 153
- Management Information Systems 94
Countries citing papers authored by Farshid Navissi
This map shows the geographic impact of Farshid Navissi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Farshid Navissi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Farshid Navissi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Farshid Navissi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Farshid Navissi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Farshid Navissi. The network helps show where Farshid Navissi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Farshid Navissi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Farshid Navissi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Farshid Navissi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Farshid Navissi. Farshid Navissi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 70 | |
| 5 | Business Strategy, Over- (Under-) Investment and Managerial Compensation | 0 |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 63 | |
| 8 | 69 | |
| 9 | The Association Between Accruals Quality and the Characteristics of Accounting Experts and Mix of Expertise on Audit Committees*breakdown → | 521 |
| 10 | The Systematic Risk Effect of Hybrid Security Classification | 3 |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 101 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 12 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | Regulation of Prices and Earnings Management | 1 |
| 20 | 3 |
About Farshid Navissi
Farshid Navissi is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Finance, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Corporate Finance and Governance (24 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (24 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (16 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (1.2k citations), Strategy and Management (627 citations) and Finance (226 citations). Farshid Navissi has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Frequent co-authors include Vic Naiker, Dan S. Dhaliwal, Mehdi Khedmati, Edwin KiaYang Lim, Robert W. Faff, Cameron Truong, Ferdinand A. Gul, Keryn Chalmers, Wen Qu and Divesh S. Sharma. Their work appears in journals such as The Accounting Review, Journal of Corporate Finance and Contemporary Accounting Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.