Fabrizia D’Antonio
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Carlo de LenaAlessandro TrebbastoniAlessandra CampanelliLetizia ImbrianoMagda GharbiyaAntonella Di VitaMaddalena BocciaMarco Canevelli
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (22 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers)
- Journals
- BrainNeurologyScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Fabrizia D’Antonio
47 papers receiving 780 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Psychiatry and Mental health 227
- Cognitive Neuroscience 215
- Ophthalmology 189
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 177
- Physiology 136
Countries citing papers authored by Fabrizia D’Antonio
This map shows the geographic impact of Fabrizia D’Antonio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fabrizia D’Antonio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fabrizia D’Antonio more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fabrizia D’Antonio
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fabrizia D’Antonio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fabrizia D’Antonio. The network helps show where Fabrizia D’Antonio may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fabrizia D’Antonio
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fabrizia D’Antonio. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fabrizia D’Antonio based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fabrizia D’Antonio. Fabrizia D’Antonio is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 40 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Fabrizia D’Antonio
Fabrizia D’Antonio is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 793 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (22 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (12 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (189 citations), Neurology (124 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (227 citations). Fabrizia D’Antonio has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Carlo de Lena, Alessandro Trebbastoni, Alessandra Campanelli, Letizia Imbriano, Magda Gharbiya, Antonella Di Vita, Maddalena Boccia, Marco Canevelli, Cecilia Guariglia and Giuseppe Bruno. Their work appears in journals such as Brain, Neurology and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.