Fabian Proch
- Computational Mechanics top 1%
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes top 1%
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality top 1%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Aerospace Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- Andreas KempfM. RabaçalMartin RiethF. Cavallo MarincolaOliver T. SteinBenjamin FranchettiPascale DomingoLuc Vervisch
- Topics
- Combustion and flame dynamics (15 papers)Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (8 papers)Fire dynamics and safety research (7 papers)
- Cited by
- Fluid Flow and Transfer ProcessesComputational MechanicsSafety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomPortugal
In The Last Decade
Fabian Proch
18 papers receiving 855 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Computational Mechanics 808
- Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes 488
- Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 351
- Biomedical Engineering 249
- Aerospace Engineering 115
Countries citing papers authored by Fabian Proch
This map shows the geographic impact of Fabian Proch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fabian Proch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fabian Proch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fabian Proch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fabian Proch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fabian Proch. The network helps show where Fabian Proch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Fabian Proch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Fabian Proch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Fabian Proch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Fabian Proch. Fabian Proch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 16 | |
| 2 | 22 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | 34 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 52 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 91 | |
| 9 | 88 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 76 | |
| 12 | 106 | |
| 13 | 109 | |
| 14 | 47 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 71 | |
| 17 | 74 | |
| 18 | 5 |
About Fabian Proch
Fabian Proch is a scholar working on Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, Computational Mechanics and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, having authored 18 papers that have together received 860 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Combustion and flame dynamics (15 papers), Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies (8 papers) and Fire dynamics and safety research (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes (488 citations), Computational Mechanics (808 citations) and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (351 citations). Fabian Proch has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Andreas Kempf, M. Rabaçal, Martin Rieth, F. Cavallo Marincola, Oliver T. Stein, Benjamin Franchetti, Pascale Domingo, Luc Vervisch, Christian Hasse and Mário Costa. Their work appears in journals such as Chemical Engineering Science, Combustion and Flame and Physics of Fluids.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.