F. Weber

33 papers receiving 500 citations

Peers

F. Weber
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 374
  • Radiation 126
  • Mechanics of Materials 246
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 282
  • Geophysics 113
Replace I. N. Ross with:
I. N. Ross United Kingdom
B. K. Young United States
F. Falliès France
E. Gaul United States
S. F. Khan United States
J. McGurn United States
K. L. Lancaster United Kingdom
N. Booth United Kingdom
A. Jochmann Germany
S. Payeur Canada
F. Weber relative to I. N. Ross United Kingdom I. N. Ross's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
I. N. Ross · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Weber. The network helps show where F. Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Weber Line = papers co-authored together F. Weber links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995135
2 200669
3 200461
4 199643
5 199742
6 200024
7 199524
8 200419
9 199615
10 199513
11 199510
12 199610
13 20018
14 20088
15 19997
16 20076
17 20046
18 19975
19 19963
20 19963

About F. Weber

F. Weber is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Mechanics of Materials, Radiation and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 35 papers that have together received 533 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (20 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (15 papers), Atomic and Molecular Physics (13 papers), X-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis (8 papers), Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (7 papers), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (4 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (4 papers) and Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (374 citations), Radiation (126 citations), Mechanics of Materials (246 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (282 citations) and Geophysics (113 citations). F. Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include R. Cauble, P. M. Celliers, A. Wan, L. B. Da Silva, J. E. Trebes, O. L. Landen, Troy W. Barbee, R. E. Turner, E. L. Dewald and Kelly Campbell. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Scientific Instruments, Physical Review Letters, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact