F. V. Abbott

1.0k citations
22 papers · 865 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

F. V. Abbott

22 papers receiving 842 citations

Peers

F. V. Abbott
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Physiology 478
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 59
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 311
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 49
  • Pharmacology 75
Replace D.M. Wright with:
D.M. Wright United Kingdom
Mohammed Shaqura Germany
Stephen Butler Sweden
J. Hawthorn United Kingdom
Maria Osikowicz Poland
Cosimo Massafra Italy
Lal H United States
Gary McCleane United Kingdom
Christopher W. Loomis Canada
Robert B. Raffa United States
F. V. Abbott relative to D.M. Wright United Kingdom D.M. Wright's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
D.M. Wright · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. V. Abbott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. V. Abbott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. V. Abbott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. V. Abbott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. V. Abbott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. V. Abbott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. V. Abbott. The network helps show where F. V. Abbott may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. V. Abbott, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. V. Abbott Line = papers co-authored together F. V. Abbott links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996115
2 1994101
3 198185
4
Use and abuse of over-the-counter analgesic agents.
199882
5 199375
6 199269
7 198651
8 198942
9 199742
10 198137
11 199733
12 198531
13 200330
14 198728
15
Plasma concentrations of fentanyl with subcutaneous infusion in palliative care patients.
199515
16 199210
17 19838
18 19914
19 19853
20 19842

About F. V. Abbott

F. V. Abbott is a scholar working on Physiology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Surgery and Small Animals, having authored 22 papers that have together received 865 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (13 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (7 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (3 papers), Vasculitis and related conditions (2 papers), Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders (2 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (478 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (59 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (311 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (49 citations) and Pharmacology (75 citations). F. V. Abbott has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Yanguo Hong, Keith B.J. Franklin, Pierre Blier, Ronald Melzack, Mary Ellen Jeans, Céleste Johnston, Katherine Gray‐Donald, George Kunos, Andrew J. Rees and Sally Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Pain, Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior, Neuroscience, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation and Clinical Journal of Pain.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact