F. T. Falciano
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 10%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- Nelson Pinto-NetoPatrick PeterM. LilleySandro D. P. VitentiRoberto PereiraJ. C. FabrisWard StruyveM. Novello
- Topics
- Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (23 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (15 papers)Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPhysics Letters APhysical review. D
In The Last Decade
F. T. Falciano
27 papers receiving 248 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 227
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 165
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 99
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 73
- Artificial Intelligence 11
Countries citing papers authored by F. T. Falciano
This map shows the geographic impact of F. T. Falciano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. T. Falciano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. T. Falciano more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. T. Falciano
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. T. Falciano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. T. Falciano. The network helps show where F. T. Falciano may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. T. Falciano
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. T. Falciano. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. T. Falciano based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. T. Falciano. F. T. Falciano is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 24 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 0 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About F. T. Falciano
F. T. Falciano is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 31 papers that have together received 255 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (23 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (15 papers) and Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (227 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (165 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (99 citations). F. T. Falciano has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, Russia and France. Frequent co-authors include Nelson Pinto-Neto, Patrick Peter, M. Lilley, Sandro D. P. Vitenti, Roberto Pereira, J. C. Fabris, Ward Struyve, M. Novello, Eric V. Linder and J. M. Salim. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Physics Letters A and Physical review. D.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.