F. S. C. Northrop
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Social Psychology
- Law top 5%
- Co-authors
- John M. WildLéo StraussDavid BidneyBertrand de JouvenelÉdgar BodenheimerBert James LoewenbergK. M. PanikkarEdward McWhinney
- Topics
- Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (3 papers)European and International Law Studies (2 papers)Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers)
- Journals
- The Philosophical ReviewThe Journal of PhilosophyThe Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
F. S. C. Northrop
24 papers receiving 302 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Sociology and Political Science 139
- Political Science and International Relations 137
- Philosophy 113
- Social Psychology 40
- Law 35
Countries citing papers authored by F. S. C. Northrop
This map shows the geographic impact of F. S. C. Northrop's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. S. C. Northrop with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. S. C. Northrop more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. S. C. Northrop
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. S. C. Northrop. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. S. C. Northrop. The network helps show where F. S. C. Northrop may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. S. C. Northrop
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. S. C. Northrop. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. S. C. Northrop based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. S. C. Northrop. F. S. C. Northrop is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The political imperative : the corporate character of unions | 1 |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | Comparative Philosophy of Comparative Law | 5 |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | Meeting of East and West | 3 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | The Method and Some Findings of Anthropological Jurisprudence | 1 |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 239 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | The meeting of East and West : an inquiry concerning world understanding | 8 |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 7 |
About F. S. C. Northrop
F. S. C. Northrop is a scholar working on Law, Religious studies and Public Administration, having authored 28 papers that have together received 404 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (3 papers), European and International Law Studies (2 papers) and Legal Education and Practice Innovations (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (113 citations), Political Science and International Relations (137 citations) and Law (35 citations). F. S. C. Northrop has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John M. Wild, Léo Strauss, David Bidney, Bertrand de Jouvenel, Édgar Bodenheimer, Bert James Loewenberg, K. M. Panikkar, Edward McWhinney and W. Friedmann. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.