F. Raja
Impact in
- Reproductive Medicine top 1%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
- Endometriosis Research and Treatment
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 5%
- Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 7
- Surgery 5
- Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies 5
- Co-authors
- Jonathan A. Ledermann (6 shared papers)Antonio González-Martı́n (3 shared papers)Christina Fotopoulou (2 shared papers)Nicoletta Colombo (3 shared papers)Cristiana Sessa (1 shared paper)Neha Chopra (1 shared paper)C. Sessa (1 shared paper)N. Colombo (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Annals of Oncology (7 papers)British Journal of Cancer (1 paper)American Journal of Clinical Pathology (1 paper)Clinical Oncology (1 paper)ESMO Open (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
F. Raja
8 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Reproductive Medicine 781
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 207
- Oncology 497
- Cancer Research 160
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 134
Countries citing papers authored by F. Raja
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Raja's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Raja with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Raja more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. Raja
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Raja. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Raja. The network helps show where F. Raja may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Raja, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Newly diagnosed and relapsed epithelial ovarian carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up Hit paper breakdown → | 2013 | 791 |
| 2 | 2012 | 104 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 104 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 64 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 63 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 48 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 0 |
About F. Raja
F. Raja is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Oncology and Cancer Research, having authored 12 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (7 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (5 papers), Renal cell carcinoma treatment (3 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (2 papers), Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (2 papers), Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology (1 paper), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper) and Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (781 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (207 citations), Oncology (497 citations), Cancer Research (160 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (134 citations). F. Raja has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jonathan A. Ledermann, Antonio González-Martı́n, Christina Fotopoulou, Nicoletta Colombo, Cristiana Sessa, Neha Chopra, C. Sessa, N. Colombo, Mahesh Parmar and Clare Griffin. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Oncology, British Journal of Cancer, American Journal of Clinical Pathology, Clinical Oncology and ESMO Open.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.