F. Proulx

983 citations
24 papers · 728 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

F. Proulx

24 papers receiving 679 citations

Peers

F. Proulx
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 139
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 230
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 132
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 255
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 123
Replace Ruan Peng with:
Ruan Peng China
Yali Zhang China
Duck Hwan Choi South Korea
Tetsuo Ono Japan
W. Ye United States
Luke A. Hardy United States
Elijah H. Bolin United States
Jilske Huijben Netherlands
Rajiv R. Shah United States
Thomas C. Hutchens United States
F. Proulx relative to Ruan Peng China Ruan Peng's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.5×
Ruan Peng · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Proulx

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Proulx's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Proulx with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Proulx more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Proulx

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Proulx. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Proulx. The network helps show where F. Proulx may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Proulx, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Proulx Line = papers co-authored together F. Proulx links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 24 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004102
2 201694
3 201692
4 200990
5 200161
6 201057
7 199856
8 200347
9 201636
10 200918
11 200113
12 201612
13 201612
14 20029
15 20109
16 20166
17
[Importance of intrauterine diagnosis of rudimentary autonomic circulation in an acardiac twin].
19966
18 20152
19 20171
20 20081

About F. Proulx

F. Proulx is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 728 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Assisted Reproductive Technology and Twin Pregnancy (8 papers), solar cell performance optimization (7 papers), Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy (7 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (7 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (5 papers), Chalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films (4 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (4 papers) and Congenital Heart Disease Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (139 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (230 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (132 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (255 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (123 citations). F. Proulx has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Jean‐Claude Fouron, Vincent Aimez, Richard Arès, Edgar Jaeggi, M. C. A. York, Denis Masson, Y. Ville, M. Essaoui, B. Nasr and S. Fafard. Their work appears in journals such as Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, Applied Physics Letters, Circulation, Heart and physica status solidi (RRL) - Rapid Research Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact