F. Priester

782 total citations
26 papers, 186 citations indexed

About

F. Priester is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Priester has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 186 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 11 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 10 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in F. Priester's work include Muon and positron interactions and applications (11 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (10 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (10 papers). F. Priester is often cited by papers focused on Muon and positron interactions and applications (11 papers), Neutrino Physics Research (10 papers) and Fusion materials and technologies (10 papers). F. Priester collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Spain. F. Priester's co-authors include B. Bornschein, Michael Sturm, M. Röllig, Magnus Schlösser, S. Niemes, Manuel Klein, G. Drexlin, Helmut H. Telle, S. Welte and Richard J. Lewis and has published in prestigious journals such as Sensors, Vacuum and Fusion Engineering and Design.

In The Last Decade

F. Priester

22 papers receiving 183 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
F. Priester Germany 9 76 69 59 50 30 26 186
M. Röllig Germany 6 40 0.5× 42 0.6× 38 0.6× 32 0.6× 17 0.6× 19 108
M. Kurata-Nishimura Japan 9 64 0.8× 30 0.4× 31 0.5× 48 1.0× 6 0.2× 25 160
J.L. Hemmerich United Kingdom 12 181 2.4× 284 4.1× 67 1.1× 65 1.3× 162 5.4× 49 397
G. Drexlin Germany 10 331 4.4× 12 0.2× 28 0.5× 41 0.8× 14 0.5× 27 373
С. К. Гришечкин Russia 7 68 0.9× 49 0.7× 28 0.5× 24 0.5× 36 1.2× 24 157
C. S. Young United States 8 127 1.7× 14 0.2× 139 2.4× 23 0.5× 23 0.8× 14 188
V. Egorov Russia 10 217 2.9× 15 0.2× 76 1.3× 19 0.4× 19 0.6× 25 263
В. Н. Корноухов Russia 10 169 2.2× 33 0.5× 56 0.9× 16 0.3× 9 0.3× 32 245
V. Brudanin Russia 9 223 2.9× 31 0.4× 118 2.0× 21 0.4× 8 0.3× 39 319
P. Bach Switzerland 7 26 0.3× 29 0.4× 61 1.0× 13 0.3× 22 0.7× 17 115

Countries citing papers authored by F. Priester

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Priester's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Priester with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Priester more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Priester

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Priester. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Priester. The network helps show where F. Priester may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Priester

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Priester. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Priester based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Priester. F. Priester is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Aker, M., Robin Größle, Daniel Kurz, et al.. (2024). Monitoring of ozone production and depletion rates in a tritium-compatible system. Fusion Engineering and Design. 203. 114425–114425.
2.
Priester, F., Robin Größle, N. Bekris, & I. Cristescu. (2023). A new facility for the measurement of the Sieverts’-constant for PbLi with tritium. Fusion Engineering and Design. 191. 113568–113568. 1 indexed citations
3.
Wydra, J., A. Marsteller, Robin Größle, F. Priester, & Michael Sturm. (2023). ViMA—The Spinning Rotor Gauge to Measure the Viscosity of Tritium Between 77 and 300 K. Fusion Science & Technology. 80(3-4). 616–622. 1 indexed citations
4.
Aker, M., Michael Sturm, F. Priester, et al.. (2023). In Situ Tritium Decontamination of the KATRIN Rear Wall Using an Ultraviolet/Ozone Treatment. Fusion Science & Technology. 80(3-4). 303–310. 1 indexed citations
5.
Hillesheimer, D., A. Marsteller, F. Priester, et al.. (2023). Four Years of Tritium Operation of the KATRIN Experiment at TLK. Fusion Science & Technology. 80(3-4). 465–471.
6.
Marsteller, A., B. Bornschein, S. Enomoto, et al.. (2022). Operation modes of the KATRIN experiment Tritium Loop System using 83mKr. Journal of Instrumentation. 17(12). P12010–P12010.
7.
Wydra, J., et al.. (2022). Towards the first direct measurement of the dynamic viscosity of gaseous tritium at cryogenic temperatures. Vacuum. 203. 111237–111237. 2 indexed citations
8.
Sturm, Michael, F. Priester, M. Röllig, et al.. (2021). Kilogram scale throughput performance of the KATRIN tritium handling system. Fusion Engineering and Design. 170. 112507–112507. 5 indexed citations
9.
Priester, F., D. Hillesheimer, A. Marsteller, M. Röllig, & Michael Sturm. (2020). Tritium Processing Systems and First Tritium Operation of the KATRIN Experiment. Fusion Science & Technology. 76(4). 600–604. 2 indexed citations
10.
Röllig, M., et al.. (2016). Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations for sensitivity investigations of an experimental facility for the measurement of tritium surface contaminations by BIXS. Fusion Engineering and Design. 109-111. 684–687. 8 indexed citations
11.
Demange, D., Sebastian Fischer, T. L. Le, et al.. (2015). CAPER as Central and Crucial Facility to Support R&D with Tritium at TLK. Fusion Science & Technology. 67(2). 308–311. 2 indexed citations
12.
Röllig, M., et al.. (2015). Development of a compact tritium activity monitor and first tritium measurements. Fusion Engineering and Design. 100. 177–180. 13 indexed citations
13.
Niemes, S., et al.. (2015). Investigations of the applicability of a new accountancy tool in a closed tritium loop. Fusion Engineering and Design. 109-111. 1376–1379. 4 indexed citations
14.
Priester, F. & Manuel Klein. (2015). TRitium Activity Measurements with a PhotomultipliEr in Liquids–The TRAMPEL experiment. Fusion Engineering and Design. 109-111. 1356–1359. 9 indexed citations
15.
Priester, F., Michael Sturm, & B. Bornschein. (2015). Commissioning and detailed results of KATRIN inner loop tritium processing system at Tritium Laboratory Karlsruhe. Vacuum. 116. 42–47. 12 indexed citations
16.
Priester, F. & M. Röllig. (2015). Post Service Examination of Turbomolecular Pumps after Stress Testing with kg-Scale Tritium Throughput. Fusion Science & Technology. 67(3). 539–542. 1 indexed citations
17.
Priester, F. & B. Bornschein. (2012). TriToP – A compatibility experiment with turbomolecular pumps under tritium atmosphere. Vacuum. 98. 22–28. 9 indexed citations
18.
Demange, D., N. Bekris, B. Bornschein, et al.. (2012). Overview of R&D at TLK for process and analytical issues on tritium management in breeder blankets of ITER and DEMO. Fusion Engineering and Design. 87(7-8). 1206–1213. 35 indexed citations
19.
Röllig, M., F. Priester, M. Babutzka, et al.. (2012). Activity monitoring of a gaseous tritium source by beta induced X-ray spectrometry. Fusion Engineering and Design. 88(6-8). 1263–1266. 18 indexed citations
20.
Fischer, Sebastian, Michael Sturm, Magnus Schlösser, et al.. (2011). Monitoring of Tritium Purity During Long-Term Circulation in the KATRIN Test Experiment LOOPINO Using Laser Raman Spectroscopy. Fusion Science & Technology. 60(3). 925–930. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026