F. Pecker
Impact in
- Physiology top 5%
- Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
-
- Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling 3
- Co-authors
- Catherine Pavoine (20 shared papers)Sophie Lotersztajn (17 shared papers)Jacques Hanoune (5 shared papers)Rodolphe Fischmeister (3 shared papers)Pierre‐François Méry (2 shared papers)Laurent Belhassen (1 shared paper)Ariane Mallat (7 shared papers)Marie‐Lise Lacombe (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological Chemistry (17 papers)American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology (2 papers)Journal of Hepatology (1 paper)Cell Calcium (1 paper)Clinical Science (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- FranceCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
F. Pecker
31 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Physiology 64
- Physiology 362
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 317
- Molecular Biology 877
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 223
Countries citing papers authored by F. Pecker
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Pecker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Pecker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Pecker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. Pecker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Pecker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Pecker. The network helps show where F. Pecker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Pecker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 32 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1993 | 387 | |
| 2 | 1981 | 191 | |
| 3 | 2009 | 113 | |
| 4 | 1995 | 89 | |
| 5 | 1977 | 64 | |
| 6 | 1975 | 58 | |
| 7 | 1984 | 55 | |
| 8 | 1990 | 42 | |
| 9 | 1990 | 41 | |
| 10 | 1987 | 38 | |
| 11 | 1992 | 38 | |
| 12 | 1982 | 34 | |
| 13 | 1992 | 29 | |
| 14 | 1991 | 28 | |
| 15 | 1987 | 28 | |
| 16 | 1993 | 27 | |
| 17 | 1979 | 23 | |
| 18 | 1990 | 21 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 20 | |
| 20 | 1985 | 20 |
About F. Pecker
F. Pecker is a scholar working on Physiology, Hepatology, Cell Biology, Surgery and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic function and diabetes (14 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers), Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease (5 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (5 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (4 papers), Diabetes Treatment and Management (4 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (3 papers) and Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physiology (64 citations), Physiology (362 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (317 citations), Molecular Biology (877 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (223 citations). F. Pecker has collaborated with scholars based in France, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Catherine Pavoine, Sophie Lotersztajn, Jacques Hanoune, Rodolphe Fischmeister, Pierre‐François Méry, Laurent Belhassen, Ariane Mallat, Marie‐Lise Lacombe, Véronique Brechler and D. Bataille. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology, Journal of Hepatology, Cell Calcium and Clinical Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.