F. Meyer

2.3k citations
57 papers · 897 indexed · h-index 17

F. Meyer

55 papers receiving 854 citations

Peers

F. Meyer
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 866
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 168
  • Geophysics 99
  • Instrumentation 10
  • Oceanography 31
Replace I. Kondò with:
I. Kondò Japan
K. J. Frost United States
L. E. Orwig United States
S. Brandt Spain
Eric R. Coughlin United States
Yoji Osaki Japan
U. Anzer Germany
L. Nobili Italy
G. Björnsson Iceland
Yu. N. Gnedin Russia
F. Meyer relative to I. Kondò Japan I. Kondò's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×9.7×
I. Kondò · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Meyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Meyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Meyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Meyer. The network helps show where F. Meyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Meyer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Meyer Line = papers co-authored together F. Meyer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20128
2 20119
3 20084
4 20083
5 20067
6 200517
7 200558
8 20042
9 200334
10 200316
11 200112
12 200125
13
Dwarf novae in quiescence: the relationship between disk evaporation and accretion onto a white-dwarf
19954
14 19902
15
Numerical investigation of transition in 3D boundary layers
198910
16 19894
17
On the pre-outburst state of dwarf novae.
19871
18
A model for the standstill of the Z Camelopardalis variables.
19830
19
Formation of cataclysmic binaries through common envelope evolution.
197919
20
A Model for the Evershed Flaw in Sunspots
19688

About F. Meyer

F. Meyer is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Geophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Fluid Flow and Transfer Processes, having authored 57 papers that have together received 897 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (40 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (22 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (11 papers), Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (10 papers), Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (8 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (7 papers), Mechanics and Biomechanics Studies (6 papers) and Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (866 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (168 citations), Geophysics (99 citations), Instrumentation (10 citations) and Oceanography (31 citations). F. Meyer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, China and Japan. Frequent co-authors include E. Meyer‐Hofmeister, H. U. Schmidt, N. O. Weiss, B. F. Liu, Y. Osaki, P. R. Wilson, Shin Mineshige, Toshihiro Kawaguchi, Ronald E. Taam and W. Winkler. Their work appears in journals such as Astronomy and Astrophysics, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, The Astrophysical Journal, Sadhana and Nature.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026