F. M. Kamm

4.1k total citations
88 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

F. M. Kamm is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, F. M. Kamm has authored 88 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Philosophy, 25 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 20 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in F. M. Kamm's work include Ethics in medical practice (19 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (17 papers) and Free Will and Agency (16 papers). F. M. Kamm is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in medical practice (19 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (17 papers) and Free Will and Agency (16 papers). F. M. Kamm collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. F. M. Kamm's co-authors include Peter Unger, John Broome, Mary Anne Warren, Ronald Dworkin, Norman Daniels, Dan W. Brock, Peter A. Graham, Liezl van Zyl, Shelly Kagan and Ezio Di Nucci and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Health Policy.

In The Last Decade

F. M. Kamm

77 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

F. M. Kamm
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 728
  • Philosophy 623
  • Political Science and International Relations 351
  • General Health Professions 285
  • Sociology and Political Science 264
Replace Т. М. Scanlon with:
Т. М. Scanlon United States
Shelly Kagan United States
Barbara Herman United States
Laura W. Ekstrom United States
J. J. C. Smart Australia
Bernard Williams Australia
L. W. Sumner Canada
Torbjörn Tännsjö Sweden
Thomas Hurka Canada
George Sher United States
Т. М. Scanlon United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to F. M. Kamm
F. M. Kamm · 1×
Citations per year, relative to F. M. Kamm
F. M. Kamm · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by F. M. Kamm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. M. Kamm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. M. Kamm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. M. Kamm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. M. Kamm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. M. Kamm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. M. Kamm. The network helps show where F. M. Kamm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. M. Kamm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. M. Kamm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. M. Kamm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. M. Kamm. F. M. Kamm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 4
2 1
3 1
4 1
5 2
6
Cost Effectiveness Analysis and Fairness
3
7 55
8 14
9
Baselines and Compensation
0
10 8
11 2
12
The Doctrine of Triple Effect and Why a Rational Agent Need Not Intend the Means to His End
27
13 4
14
Morality, Mortality Vol. II: Rights, Duties, and Status
33
15
Rights, duties, and status
7
16 6
17
Death and whom to save from it
23
18 2
19
Equal treatment and equal chances
20
20 36

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026