F. Leone

908 total citations · 1 hit paper
14 papers, 605 citations indexed

About

F. Leone is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, F. Leone has authored 14 papers receiving a total of 605 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 7 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 1 paper in Surgery. Recurrent topics in F. Leone's work include Endometriosis Research and Treatment (8 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (6 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers). F. Leone is often cited by papers focused on Endometriosis Research and Treatment (8 papers), Gynecological conditions and treatments (6 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (4 papers). F. Leone collaborates with scholars based in Italy, Belgium and Sweden. F. Leone's co-authors include S. Guerriero, L. Valentin, D. Timmerman, E. Epstein, Hans A.M. Brölmann, T. Bourne, C. Exacoustós, C Rasmussen, Stephan Gordts and A. Votino and has published in prestigious journals such as Human Reproduction, Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology and Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

F. Leone

12 papers receiving 592 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group

2015 473 citations Margit Dueholm, F. Leone et al. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
F. Leone Italy	4	533	470	85	74	65	14	605
Stefania Rossi Italy	11	437 0.8×	418 0.9×	111 1.3×	124 1.7×	53 0.8×	17	599
K. Pateman United Kingdom	9	494 0.9×	471 1.0×	85 1.0×	64 0.9×	69 1.1×	12	580
Sanja Kupesic‐Urek Croatia	8	214 0.4×	204 0.4×	41 0.5×	63 0.9×	35 0.5×	9	323
C. Laparte Spain	12	318 0.6×	259 0.6×	94 1.1×	75 1.0×	6 0.1×	21	418
J Hamou France	16	287 0.5×	500 1.1×	116 1.4×	96 1.3×	69 1.1×	30	620
R. Husicka Belgium	7	227 0.4×	187 0.4×	107 1.3×	197 2.7×	22 0.3×	7	437
I. Bekavac Croatia	9	183 0.3×	145 0.3×	58 0.7×	100 1.4×	72 1.1×	13	340
I. Ludwin Poland	17	295 0.6×	678 1.4×	88 1.0×	231 3.1×	81 1.2×	41	762
Santiago Bau Spain	12	294 0.6×	402 0.9×	41 0.5×	200 2.7×	99 1.5×	16	640
Firoozeh Ahmadi Iran	11	154 0.3×	223 0.5×	83 1.0×	116 1.6×	60 0.9×	64	380

Countries citing papers authored by F. Leone

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Leone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Leone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Leone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Leone

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Leone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Leone. The network helps show where F. Leone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Leone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Leone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Leone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Leone. F. Leone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

14 of 14 papers shown

Moro, F., S. Boopathy Vijayaraghavan, Francesca Nardelli, et al.. (2020). Imaging in gynecological disease (20): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of adnexal torsion. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 56(6). 934–943. 49 indexed citations

Leone, F., et al.. (2016). EP30.03: Preoperative sonobioptic based triage versus frozen section in endometrial cancer assessment: preliminary report of a 10‐year study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 48(S1). 388–388. 1 indexed citations

Dueholm, Margit, F. Leone, L. Valentin, et al.. (2015). Terms, definitions and measurements to describe sonographic features of myometrium and uterine masses: a consensus opinion from the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) group. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 46(3). 284–298. 473 indexed citations breakdown →

Valentin, L., Lieveke Ameye, L. Savelli, et al.. (2011). Adnexal masses difficult to classify as benign or malignant using subjective assessment of gray‐scale and Doppler ultrasound findings: logistic regression models do not help. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 38(4). 456–465. 67 indexed citations

Guerriero, S., Maurício Simões Abrão, Gernot Hudelist, et al.. (2011). P29.03: Ultrasonography in deep endometriosis: a consensus opinion from the International Deep Endometriosis Analysis (IDEA) group. A preliminary statement. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 38(S1). 265–265.

Bosch, T. Van den, T. Bourne, T. Bignardi, et al.. (2009). OC11.01: Comparison of gel instillation sonography (GIS) with unenhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of uterine intracavity lesions. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 34(S1). 19–19.

Bignardi, T., et al.. (2007). OC08: Ovarian damage after laparoscopic excision of endometriomas: a quantitative analysis by 3D ultrasound. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 30(4). 369–369. 1 indexed citations

Leone, F., E. Ferrazzi, Errico Zupi, et al.. (2005). 5. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 12(5). 3–3. 1 indexed citations

Leone, F., Luca Carsana, Chiara Lanzani, Luca Vago, & E. Ferrazzi. (2003). OC105: Endometrial guided biopsy during sonohysterography and during hysteroscopy: a comparative study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 22(S1). 29–29. 1 indexed citations

10.

Leone, F., et al.. (2001). Cervical cerclage after hysteroscopic metroplasty. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 18(s1). 3 indexed citations

11.

Leone, F., et al.. (2001). Asymptomatic endometrial polyps in postmenopausal women: are they an indication for surgical removal?. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 18(s1). 2 indexed citations

12.

Levi-Setti, Paolo Emanuele, Patrizia Sulpizio, G. Ragusa, et al.. (1997). P-097. Patient age and FSH concentration as prognostic factors in IVF outcome. Human Reproduction. 12(Suppl_2). 166–167. 1 indexed citations

13.

Colagrande, Stefano, et al.. (1995). [Peliosis hepatis: semiology with ultrasonography, computerized tomography, and magnetic resonance. Report of 2 cases].. PubMed. 89(6). 897–900. 4 indexed citations

14.

Vitale, Alejandra M., et al.. (1989). Josamycin in the treatment of chlamydial genital infections in infertile women.. PubMed. 1(4 Suppl). 906–8. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact