F. J. Zapata
- Plant Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Biotechnology top 5%
- Cell Biology
- Genetics
- Co-authors
- S. K. RainaG. C. Ghosh BiswasK. C. SinkLina TorrizoE. C. CockingChuanyin WuP. K. EvansJ. B. Power
- Topics
- Plant tissue culture and regeneration (26 papers)Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies (9 papers)Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- PhilippinesIndiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
F. J. Zapata
28 papers receiving 401 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Plant Science 464
- Molecular Biology 449
- Biotechnology 103
- Cell Biology 40
- Genetics 36
Countries citing papers authored by F. J. Zapata
This map shows the geographic impact of F. J. Zapata's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. J. Zapata with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. J. Zapata more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. J. Zapata
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. J. Zapata. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. J. Zapata. The network helps show where F. J. Zapata may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. J. Zapata
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. J. Zapata. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. J. Zapata based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. J. Zapata. F. J. Zapata is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Differences in Response of Rice(Oryza sativa L.) Cultivars to Herbicides | 0 |
| 2 | Rice biotechnology at IRRI. | 1 |
| 3 | Biotechnology for rice improvement. | 2 |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | Effect of abscisic acid and zeatin on plant regeneration from scutellum-derived callus of rice (Oryza sativa L.) cv. 'Nona Bokra'. | 5 |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | One-step rice plantlet development through anther culture. | 2 |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | Cytology and Histology in Somatic Embryogenesis of Indica Rice | 1 |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 29 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 47 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 24 | |
| 20 | Molecular markers for the identification of nuclear and organelle genomes in somatic hybrid plants of the Solanaceae. | 2 |
About F. J. Zapata
F. J. Zapata is a scholar working on Plant Science, Biotechnology and Molecular Biology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant tissue culture and regeneration (26 papers), Plant Genetic and Mutation Studies (9 papers) and Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (464 citations), Biotechnology (103 citations) and Molecular Biology (449 citations). F. J. Zapata has collaborated with scholars based in Philippines, India and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include S. K. Raina, G. C. Ghosh Biswas, K. C. Sink, Lina Torrizo, E. C. Cocking, Chuanyin Wu, P. K. Evans, J. B. Power, T. W. Mew and Evangelina S. Ella. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Botany, Theoretical and Applied Genetics and Crop Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.