F. Irie
- Condensed Matter Physics top 5%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Biomedical Engineering
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Keiji YoshidaKeiji EnpukuTadao NagatsumaK. YamafujiToshinobu ChibaK. FunakiM. TakeoYoshio Hirabayashi
- Topics
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (15 papers)Superconducting Materials and Applications (11 papers)Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- JapanUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
F. Irie
23 papers receiving 515 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Condensed Matter Physics 417
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 224
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 157
- Biomedical Engineering 135
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 103
Countries citing papers authored by F. Irie
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Irie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Irie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Irie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. Irie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Irie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Irie. The network helps show where F. Irie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Irie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Irie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Irie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. Irie. F. Irie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | [Multiple cavernous angiomas accompanied with a convexity meningioma: a case report]. | 7 |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | Angiokeratoma corporis diffusum with glycopeptiduria due to deficient lysosomal alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase activity. Clinical, morphologic, and biochemical studies. | 23 |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 87 | |
| 12 | 154 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 90 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About F. Irie
F. Irie is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Biomedical Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 531 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (15 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (11 papers) and Superconductivity in MgB2 and Alloys (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (417 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (224 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (103 citations). F. Irie has collaborated with scholars based in Japan, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Keiji Yoshida, Keiji Enpuku, Tadao Nagatsuma, K. Yamafuji, Toshinobu Chiba, K. Funaki, M. Takeo, Yoshio Hirabayashi, Tamotsu Kanzaki and F. Sumiyoshi. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Applied Physics Letters and Journal of Applied Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.