Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Synthesis of the Elements in Stars
19572.3k citationsG. R. Burbidge, F. Hoyle et al.profile →
On the Synthesis of Elements at Very High Temperatures
This map shows the geographic impact of F. Hoyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Hoyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Hoyle more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Hoyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Hoyle. The network helps show where F. Hoyle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. Hoyle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. Hoyle.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. Hoyle based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with F. Hoyle. F. Hoyle is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hoyle, F., G. R. Burbidge, & J. V. Narlikar. (2005). A Different Approach to Cosmology. Design Automation Conference.5 indexed citations
2.
Vogeley, Michael S., Randall R. Rojas, & F. Hoyle. (2003). Properties of Void Galaxies in the SDSS. AAS. 202.1 indexed citations
3.
Hoyle, F., et al.. (1993). Critique of Fischer-Tropsch type reactions in the solar nebula.. 21. 663–667.2 indexed citations
4.
Hoyle, F.. (1991). Some remarks on cosmology and biology. Memorie della Societa Astronomica Italiana. 62. 513.2 indexed citations
5.
Hoyle, F.. (1981). The Big Bang in Astronomy. 92. 521–524.4 indexed citations
6.
Hoyle, F. & Javier Barbero. (1981). ◆◆Energía o extinción? : en defensa de la energía nuclear. Virtual Defense Library (Ministerio de Defensa).
7.
Hoyle, F.. (1974). The work of Nicolaus Copernicus. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 336(1604). 105–114.3 indexed citations
Hoyle, F. & J. V. Narlikar. (1966). A conformal theory of gravitation. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 294(1437). 138–148.44 indexed citations
Hoyle, F. & J. V. Narlikar. (1966). On the formation of elliptical galaxies*. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 290(1421). 177–185.22 indexed citations
Hoyle, F. & J. V. Narlikar. (1964). The C -field as a direct particle field. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 282(1389). 178–183.51 indexed citations
17.
Hoyle, F., J. V. Narlikar, & Richard Schlegel. (1962). Mach’s principle and the creation of matter. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 270(1342). 334–341.136 indexed citations
18.
Hoyle, F.. (1961). The age of the galaxy. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 260(1301). 201–204.2 indexed citations
Hoyle, F.. (1960). Origin of the solar nebula.. Quarterly journal of the Royal Astronomical Society. 1. 14–203.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.