Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Sm-Nd isotopic evolution of chondrites
19801.8k citationsS. B. Jacobsen, G. J. Wasserburgprofile →
238U234U230Th232Th systematics and the precise measurement of time over the past 500,000 years
19871.0k citationsJ. H. Chen, G. J. Wasserburg et al.profile →
Nd isotopic variations and petrogenetic models
1976988 citationsG. J. Wasserburg et al.Geophysical Research Lettersprofile →
U-Th-Pb systematics in three Apollo 14 basalts and the problem of initial Pb in lunar rocks
Countries citing papers authored by G. J. Wasserburg
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of G. J. Wasserburg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. J. Wasserburg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. J. Wasserburg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. J. Wasserburg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. J. Wasserburg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. J. Wasserburg. The network helps show where G. J. Wasserburg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. J. Wasserburg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. J. Wasserburg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. J. Wasserburg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with G. J. Wasserburg. G. J. Wasserburg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chen, J. H., D. A. Papanastassiou, & G. J. Wasserburg. (2002). Re-Os Isotope Systematics in Lunar Soils and Breccias. 1818.3 indexed citations
2.
Papanastassiou, D. A., et al.. (2000). Rb-Sr and Sm-Nd of Upper Eocene Microtektites: A Potential Popigai Source. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1373.2 indexed citations
3.
Papanastassiou, D. A. & G. J. Wasserburg. (1998). Re-Os Constraints in Silicate-bearing Iron Meteorites. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 1668.1 indexed citations
4.
Chen, J. H., D. A. Papanastassiou, & G. J. Wasserburg. (1998). Re-Os Systematics in Ordinary Chondrites and Acapulco. LPI. 1663.1 indexed citations
5.
Busso, M., R. Gallino, C. M. Raiteri, & G. J. Wasserburg. (1994). Light Element Isotopic Composition in the Wind of a Typical AGB Star. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 209.1 indexed citations
6.
Sheng, Yuqi, I. D. Hutcheon, & G. J. Wasserburg. (1991). An Experimental Study of Mg Self-Diffusion in Spinel. CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology). 26. 212.1 indexed citations
7.
Sheng, Yuqi, I. D. Hutcheon, & G. J. Wasserburg. (1990). MG Isotope Heterogeneity in Plagioclase Olivine Inclusions. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 21. 1138.2 indexed citations
8.
Papanastassiou, D. A. & G. J. Wasserburg. (1987). Rayleigh Distillation Constraints on MG Isotopic Compositions. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 18. 758.2 indexed citations
9.
Papanastassiou, D. A., et al.. (1985). MG Isotopic Heterogeneities in Fine-Grained Ca-Al Inclusions. LPI. 93–94.2 indexed citations
10.
Wasserburg, G. J., et al.. (1983). An ^(107)Ag^*-^(108)Pd internal isochron for Gibeon (IVA). CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology). 18(4). 417–418.2 indexed citations
11.
Huneke, J. C., J. T. Armstrong, & G. J. Wasserburg. (1981). 41K and 26MG in Allende Inclusions and a Hint of 41CA in the Early Solar System. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 482–484.1 indexed citations
12.
Shaw, H.F. & G. J. Wasserburg. (1981). Sm-Nd and Rb-Sr Isotopic Systematics of Australasian Tektites. LPI. 967–969.1 indexed citations
13.
Papanastassiou, D. A. & G. J. Wasserburg. (1980). Evidence of ^(26)Mg Excess in Hibonite from Murchison. CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology). 412. 348.3 indexed citations
14.
Jacobsen, S. B. & G. J. Wasserburg. (1980). Sm-Nd Isotopic Systematics of Chondrites and Achondrites. CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology). 15. 307.15 indexed citations
15.
Esat, T. M., D. E. Brownlee, D. A. Papanastassiou, & G. J. Wasserburg. (1979). MG Isotopic Composition of Some Interplanetary Dust Particles. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 18. 269.3 indexed citations
16.
Kelly, William R. & G. J. Wasserburg. (1978). Evidence for the existence of Pd-107 in the early solar system. Geophysical Research Letters. 5.4 indexed citations
17.
Lee, Tong, D. A. Papanastassiou, & G. J. Wasserburg. (1976). Demonstration of Mg-26 excess in Allende and evidence for Al-26. Geophysical Research Letters. 3.29 indexed citations
18.
Dymek, R. F., A. L. Albee, & G. J. Wasserburg. (1975). A Petrologic Comparison of the Kapoeta Parent Planet With the Moon. Lunar and Planetary Science Conference. 6. 227.1 indexed citations
19.
Huneke, J. C., F. A. Podosek, G. Turner, & G. J. Wasserburg. (1972). 40Ar-39Ar Systematics in Lunar Rocks and Separated Minerals of Lunar Rocks from Apollo 14 and 15. LPI. 3. 413.3 indexed citations
20.
Craig, Harmon, et al.. (1964). Isotopic and cosmic chemistry : dedicated to Harold C. Urey on his seventieth birthday, April 29, 1963. North-Holland eBooks.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.