F. H. M. Nieman
- Rheumatology top 2%
- Surgery top 10%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Internal Medicine top 2%
- Co-authors
- Maarten BoersD. van der HeijdeR. RauMartin H. PrinsMaarten H. L. ChristiaansJ. P. van HooffRob A. de BiePhilip E.V. van Kerrebroeck
- Topics
- Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (8 papers)Pelvic floor disorders treatments (6 papers)Organ Donation and Transplantation (5 papers)
- Journals
- European Heart JournalJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatryBritish journal of surgery
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyGreece
In The Last Decade
F. H. M. Nieman
45 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Rheumatology 384
- Surgery 383
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 364
- Epidemiology 326
- Internal Medicine 172
Countries citing papers authored by F. H. M. Nieman
This map shows the geographic impact of F. H. M. Nieman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. H. M. Nieman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. H. M. Nieman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F. H. M. Nieman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. H. M. Nieman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. H. M. Nieman. The network helps show where F. H. M. Nieman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F. H. M. Nieman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F. H. M. Nieman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F. H. M. Nieman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F. H. M. Nieman. F. H. M. Nieman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 51 | |
| 2 | 73 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 71 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 58 | |
| 8 | 268 | |
| 9 | 43 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 76 | |
| 12 | [Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy is as effective as hospitalization and from a social perspective less expensive: a randomized study]. | 36 |
| 13 | 26 | |
| 14 | 65 | |
| 15 | 160 | |
| 16 | 48 | |
| 17 | 52 | |
| 18 | Effect of flow cytometry, complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and auto cross match on cadaveric renal transplant outcome. | 3 |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About F. H. M. Nieman
F. H. M. Nieman is a scholar working on Transplantation, Internal Medicine and Rheumatology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (8 papers), Pelvic floor disorders treatments (6 papers) and Organ Donation and Transplantation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Transplantation (128 citations), Internal Medicine (172 citations) and Rheumatology (384 citations). F. H. M. Nieman has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and Greece. Frequent co-authors include Maarten Boers, D. van der Heijde, R. Rau, Martin H. Prins, Maarten H. L. Christiaans, J. P. van Hooff, Rob A. de Bie, Philip E.V. van Kerrebroeck, E Aliot and G Y H Lip. Their work appears in journals such as European Heart Journal, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry and British journal of surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.