F. Ding

39 papers receiving 424 citations

Peers

F. Ding
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 102
  • Parasitology 21
  • Materials Chemistry 124
  • Global and Planetary Change 50
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 26
Replace M. Lindgren with:
M. Lindgren United States
David Lambert United States
Masahiro Ichikawa Japan
Wolfgang Bayer Germany
Christine A. Klein United States
Vikas Rai India
J. J. Bissell United Kingdom
Shekhar Gurung Nepal
Kunlun Wang China
Daniele Di Giovanni Italy
F. Ding relative to M. Lindgren United States M. Lindgren's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
M. Lindgren · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Ding

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Ding's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Ding with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Ding more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Ding

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Ding. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Ding. The network helps show where F. Ding may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Ding, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Ding Line = papers co-authored together F. Ding links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202338
2 202237
3 201535
4 202227
5 201926
6 202223
7 201721
8 201719
9 202018
10 201817
11 201016
12 202215
13 202214
14 202113
15 202110
16 202210
17 20229
18 20249
19 20208
20 20038

About F. Ding

F. Ding is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions and Information Systems, having authored 42 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Fusion materials and technologies (14 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (13 papers), Nuclear Materials and Properties (8 papers), Transboundary Water Resource Management (6 papers), Health and Conflict Studies (6 papers), Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies (4 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (3 papers) and Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (102 citations), Parasitology (21 citations), Materials Chemistry (124 citations), Global and Planetary Change (50 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (26 citations). F. Ding has collaborated with scholars based in China, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Dong Jiang, Mengmeng Hao, Qian Wang, Xiaolan Xie, Jingying Fu, Quansheng Ge, David Helman, Jürgen Scheffran, Mengmeng Hao and Di Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Nuclear Materials and Energy, Fusion Engineering and Design, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms and Journal of Cleaner Production.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact