F. Dapper

1.1k citations
39 papers · 324 indexed · h-index 11

F. Dapper

36 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

F. Dapper
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 143
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 24
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 133
  • Surgery 165
  • Neurology 47
Replace David Newman with:
David Newman Australia
Levant Guvendik United Kingdom
Marc Sakwa United States
Avio Maria Perna Italy
D SHARPE United Kingdom
Masahiko Onoe Japan
Gregory M. Janelle United States
Anna Bartunek Austria
Motoshi Kainuma Japan
Sebastian Dahlbacka Finland
F. Dapper relative to David Newman Australia David Newman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
David Newman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Dapper

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Dapper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Dapper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Dapper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Dapper

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Dapper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Dapper. The network helps show where F. Dapper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. Dapper, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Dapper Line = papers co-authored together F. Dapper links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 19986
2 19982
3 19980
4 19972
5 19963
6 199625
7 19968
8 19954
9 199512
10 19931
11 199220
12 199241
13 19927
14 19919
15 19914
16 199010
17 199032
18 19903
19
[The hemodynamic effects of a treatment with beta-receptor blockers during coronary surgery. A comparison between acebutolol and esmolol].
19905
20 198813

About F. Dapper

F. Dapper is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biochemistry, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 39 papers that have together received 324 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (10 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (8 papers), Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (7 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (6 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (6 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (5 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (5 papers) and Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (143 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (24 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (133 citations), Surgery (165 citations) and Neurology (47 citations). F. Dapper has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include G. Hempelmann, B. Zickmann, Joachim Boldt, Ch. Knothe, A. Thiel, Gernold Wozniak, W. Russ, Jürgen M. Bauer, Josef Thul and F. Hehrlein. Their work appears in journals such as The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, European Heart Journal, Perfusion and International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026