F Crépel
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurology top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Co-authors
- M. KrupaHervé DanielN. HémartDanielle JaillardD. JaillardÉtienne AudinatBertrand LambolezJean Rossier
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers)Vestibular and auditory disorders (6 papers)Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceNetherlandsUnited States
In The Last Decade
F Crépel
14 papers receiving 581 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 452
- Neurology 328
- Molecular Biology 273
- Cognitive Neuroscience 180
- Sensory Systems 95
Countries citing papers authored by F Crépel
This map shows the geographic impact of F Crépel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F Crépel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F Crépel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by F Crépel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by F Crépel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F Crépel. The network helps show where F Crépel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of F Crépel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of F Crépel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of F Crépel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with F Crépel. F Crépel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 76 | |
| 2 | Long-term depression in the cerebellum | 5 |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 108 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 93 | |
| 8 | 102 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 208 | |
| 11 | [Role of granular cells in the placement and distribution of synapses between ascending fibers and Purkinje cells of the rat cerebellum]. | 1 |
| 12 | [Selective representation of vibrissa at the level of cerebellar Purkinje cells by way of climbing fibers in rats]. | 6 |
| 13 | [Demonstration of temporary multi-innervation of the cerebellar Purkinje cells by the ascending fibers during development in the rat]. | 8 |
| 14 | [Electrophysiology of the cerebellar cortex in the staggerer mutant mouse]. | 1 |
| 15 | Electrophysiologie du cortex cerebelleux chez la souris mutante 'staggerer.' | 4 |
About F Crépel
F Crépel is a scholar working on Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Sensory Systems, having authored 15 papers that have together received 627 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (9 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (6 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (328 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (452 citations) and Sensory Systems (95 citations). F Crépel has collaborated with scholars based in France, Netherlands and United States. Frequent co-authors include M. Krupa, Hervé Daniel, N. Hémart, Danielle Jaillard, D. Jaillard, Étienne Audinat, Bertrand Lambolez, Jean Rossier, Armelle Rancillac and John Oberdick. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Brain Research and Experimental Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.