F. Booth

21 papers receiving 969 citations

Peers

F. Booth
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 440
  • Filtration and Separation 51
  • Small Animals 152
  • Animal Science and Zoology 197
  • Electrochemistry 96
Replace J. Lerchner with:
J. Lerchner Germany
R. E. Graves United States
Francesca Costanzo Italy
Peter N. Pusey United Kingdom
Joshua Monk United States
Malcolm J. Grimson United Kingdom
Weiduo Zhu China
Theodor D. Gurkov Bulgaria
J.-M. di Meglio France
R. D. Bressel United States
F. Booth relative to J. Lerchner Germany J. Lerchner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×76×
J. Lerchner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. Booth. The network helps show where F. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside F. Booth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. Booth Line = papers co-authored together F. Booth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1951379
2 1954123
3 195568
4 201165
5 195165
6 195157
7 201256
8 201533
9 201729
10 195224
11 201821
12 195119
13 201218
14 195311
15 197111
16 19548
17 19518
18 20235
19 19694
20 20193

About F. Booth

F. Booth is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, Small Animals, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics and Computational Mechanics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (8 papers), Electrostatics and Colloid Interactions (7 papers), Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies (6 papers), Livestock and Poultry Management (4 papers), Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods (3 papers), Granular flow and fluidized beds (2 papers), Microfluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies (2 papers) and Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (440 citations), Filtration and Separation (51 citations), Small Animals (152 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (197 citations) and Electrochemistry (96 citations). F. Booth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. Toscano, L. J. Wilkins, Christine J Nicol, GJ Richards, T. G. Knowles, John F. Tarlton, Nicholas C. Avery, Robert W. Taylor, Stephanie Buijs and Joanne Edgar. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Veterinary Record, Poultry Science, animal and The Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact