F. B. Goldsmith

2.6k citations
57 papers · 1.8k · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

F. B. Goldsmith

55 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

F. B. Goldsmith
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 788
  • Ecological Modeling 211
  • Global and Planetary Change 506
  • Ecology 585
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 433
Replace George R. Parker with:
George R. Parker United States
Richard M. Woodfin United Kingdom
S. R. Eyre Australia
J. Mark Dangerfield Botswana
Lindsey J. Thompson United Kingdom
Kenneth P. Lertzman Canada
Joseph Tzanopoulos United Kingdom
Angela Stanisci Italy
Jonathan Mitchley United Kingdom
Paul G. Risser United States
F. B. Goldsmith relative to George R. Parker United States George R. Parker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
George R. Parker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by F. B. Goldsmith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of F. B. Goldsmith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by F. B. Goldsmith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites F. B. Goldsmith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by F. B. Goldsmith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by F. B. Goldsmith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by F. B. Goldsmith. The network helps show where F. B. Goldsmith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside F. B. Goldsmith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with F. B. Goldsmith Line = papers co-authored together F. B. Goldsmith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1994243
2 1992237
3 1986230
4 1998161
5 1997134
6 1992106
7 198672
8 197549
9 197342
10 197941
11 199839
12 197735
13 198435
14 197033
15 199432
16 198431
17 199427
18 197823
19 199122
20 199522

About F. B. Goldsmith

F. B. Goldsmith is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 57 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany and Plant Ecology Studies (7 papers), Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (5 papers), Forest Management and Policy (4 papers), Mediterranean and Iberian flora and fauna (4 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (4 papers), Lichen and fungal ecology (3 papers), Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies (3 papers) and Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (788 citations), Ecological Modeling (211 citations), Global and Planetary Change (506 citations), Ecology (585 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (433 citations). F. B. Goldsmith has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Canada and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Ian F. Spellerberg, C. Gómez-Campo, Kristin Shrader‐Frechette, E. D. McCoy, William J. Sutherland, R.C. Thomas, K. J. Kirby, Philip C. Miller, Andrew Warren and Clive Potter. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Ecology, Journal of Applied Ecology, Biological Conservation, Journal of Biogeography and Journal of Public Health Policy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact