Ewan D. Booth

1.1k total citations
25 papers, 649 citations indexed

About

Ewan D. Booth is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Ewan D. Booth has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 649 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 14 papers in Cancer Research, 11 papers in Molecular Biology and 8 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Ewan D. Booth's work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (14 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (6 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (5 papers). Ewan D. Booth is often cited by papers focused on Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (14 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (6 papers) and Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (5 papers). Ewan D. Booth collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and United States. Ewan D. Booth's co-authors include Gordon A. Leonard, Tom Brown, Jenny Chambers, Tom Brown, G.G. Kneale, William P. Watson, Nicholas Ball, Christa Hennes, Grace Patlewicz and Elton Zvinavashe and has published in prestigious journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Journal of Molecular Biology and Carcinogenesis.

In The Last Decade

Ewan D. Booth

22 papers receiving 622 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ewan D. Booth United Kingdom 12 358 100 93 62 53 25 649
Masato Kitajima Japan 15 261 0.7× 77 0.8× 62 0.7× 108 1.7× 30 0.6× 20 607
Cornelia M. Smith United States 6 110 0.3× 144 1.4× 64 0.7× 70 1.1× 28 0.5× 7 574
David Mitchell United States 14 341 1.0× 34 0.3× 47 0.5× 16 0.3× 35 0.7× 18 672
Patra Volarath United States 3 220 0.6× 201 2.0× 32 0.3× 226 3.6× 22 0.4× 4 795
James G. Farrelly United States 17 295 0.8× 76 0.8× 115 1.2× 10 0.2× 41 0.8× 41 699
Gary J. Overmann United States 13 345 1.0× 382 3.8× 62 0.7× 44 0.7× 49 0.9× 15 824
Andrew J. Sonderfan United States 11 180 0.5× 27 0.3× 34 0.4× 21 0.3× 17 0.3× 14 689
M. Wilson Tabor United States 15 380 1.1× 98 1.0× 90 1.0× 13 0.2× 77 1.5× 27 787
Mounir Bouhifd United States 13 261 0.7× 144 1.4× 52 0.6× 93 1.5× 33 0.6× 25 537
P. Scorza Barcellona Italy 14 226 0.6× 24 0.2× 54 0.6× 23 0.4× 41 0.8× 31 758

Countries citing papers authored by Ewan D. Booth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ewan D. Booth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ewan D. Booth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ewan D. Booth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ewan D. Booth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ewan D. Booth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ewan D. Booth. The network helps show where Ewan D. Booth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ewan D. Booth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ewan D. Booth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ewan D. Booth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ewan D. Booth. Ewan D. Booth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Fowler, Paul, Alessandra Bearzatto, Carol Beevers, et al.. (2024). Assessment of the three-test genetic toxicology battery for groundwater metabolites. Mutagenesis. 39(2). 146–155. 1 indexed citations
3.
Hand, Laurence H., et al.. (2016). Use of read-across to simplify the toxicological assessment of a complex mixture of lysimeter leachate metabolites on the basis of chemical similarity and ADME behavior. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 83. 109–116. 3 indexed citations
4.
Shane, Barbara S., Errol Zeiger, Walter W. Piegorsch, et al.. (2011). Re‐evaluation of the big blue® mouse assay of propiconazole suggests lack of mutagenicity. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis. 53(1). 1–9. 6 indexed citations
5.
Crawford, Fay, Colin McCowan, Borislav D. Dimitrov, et al.. (2010). The risk of foot ulceration in people with diabetes screened in community settings: findings from a cohort study. QJM. 104(5). 403–410. 52 indexed citations
6.
Booth, Ewan D., et al.. (2007). Review of the in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity of dichlorvos. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 49(3). 316–326. 30 indexed citations
7.
Booth, Ewan D., et al.. (2004). Dose responses for DNA adduct formation in tissues of rats and mice exposed by inhalation to low concentrations of 1,3-[2,3- ]-butadiene. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 147(2). 195–211. 10 indexed citations
9.
Boogaard, Peter J., et al.. (2004). DNA adducts in rats and mice following exposure to [4- ]-1,2-epoxy-3-butene and to [2,3- ]-1,3-butadiene. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 148(1-2). 69–92. 12 indexed citations
10.
Booth, Ewan D., Joanne D. Kilgour, & William P. Watson. (2004). Dose responses for the formation of hemoglobin adducts and urinary metabolites in rats and mice exposed by inhalation to low concentrations of 1,3-[2,3-14C]-butadiene. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 147(2). 213–232. 15 indexed citations
11.
Booth, Ewan D., et al.. (2003). Metabolic distribution of radioactivity in Sprague–Dawley rats and B6C3F1 mice exposed to 1,3-[2,3-14C]–butadiene by whole body exposure. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 145(2). 175–189. 2 indexed citations
12.
Potter, David M., et al.. (1999). Studies on the dermal and systemic bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic compounds in high viscosity oil products. Archives of Toxicology. 73(3). 129–140. 17 indexed citations
13.
Booth, Ewan D., et al.. (1999). Development of a carcinogenic potency index for dermal exposure to viscous oil products. Archives of Toxicology. 73(3). 180–188. 7 indexed citations
14.
Booth, Ewan D., et al.. (1999). Effects of solvent on DNA adduct formation in skin and lung of CD1 mice exposed cutaneously to benzo(a)pyrene. Archives of Toxicology. 73(6). 316–322.
16.
Randerath, Kurt, Bhagavatula Moorthy, Jacqueline Aston, et al.. (1998). Comparison of immunoaffinity chromatography enrichment and nuclease P1 procedures for 32P-postlabelling analysis of PAH-DNA adducts. Chemico-Biological Interactions. 110(1-2). 85–102. 8 indexed citations
17.
Leonard, Gordon A., Ewan D. Booth, William N. Hunter, & Tom Brown. (1992). The conformational variability of an adenosine inosine base-pair in a synthetic DNA dodecamer. Nucleic Acids Research. 20(18). 4753–4759. 33 indexed citations
18.
Brown, Tom, Gordon A. Leonard, Ewan D. Booth, & G.G. Kneale. (1990). Influence of pH on the conformation and stability of mismatch base-pairs in DNA. Journal of Molecular Biology. 212(3). 437–440. 99 indexed citations
19.
Leonard, Gordon A., Ewan D. Booth, & Tom Brown. (1990). Structural and thermodynamic studies on the adenine.guanine mismatch in B-DNA. Nucleic Acids Research. 18(19). 5617–5623. 84 indexed citations
20.
Brown, Tom, Gordon A. Leonard, Ewan D. Booth, & Jenny Chambers. (1989). Crystal structure and stability of a DNA duplex containing A(anti) · G(syn) base-pairs. Journal of Molecular Biology. 207(2). 455–457. 113 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026