Esther Vock

652 total citations
16 papers, 337 citations indexed

About

Esther Vock is a scholar working on Cancer Research, Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Esther Vock has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 337 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cancer Research, 7 papers in Molecular Biology and 5 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Esther Vock's work include Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (11 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers). Esther Vock is often cited by papers focused on Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (11 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (4 papers) and Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (3 papers). Esther Vock collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Esther Vock's co-authors include Werner K. Lutz, Krista L. Dobo, Nigel Greene, Sebastian Schieferdecker, Laura Custer, M. Vijayaraj Reddy, Jian‐Dong Duan, Alessandro Brigo, Gary M. Williams and Wolfgang Muster and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Toxicological Sciences and Chemical Research in Toxicology.

In The Last Decade

Esther Vock

16 papers receiving 323 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Esther Vock Germany 9 151 131 81 58 38 16 337
John Nicolette United States 10 209 1.4× 152 1.2× 130 1.6× 92 1.6× 52 1.4× 20 469
Angela White United Kingdom 10 180 1.2× 100 0.8× 97 1.2× 131 2.3× 49 1.3× 22 427
Medjda Bellamri United States 12 183 1.2× 194 1.5× 99 1.2× 12 0.2× 37 1.0× 25 419
Charlotta Fred Sweden 9 209 1.4× 138 1.1× 125 1.5× 47 0.8× 66 1.7× 13 485
Milen Todorov Bulgaria 11 71 0.5× 82 0.6× 68 0.8× 163 2.8× 53 1.4× 22 320
Ivan D. Dobrev United States 11 160 1.1× 87 0.7× 178 2.2× 42 0.7× 64 1.7× 15 410
Robin E. Neft United States 10 188 1.2× 273 2.1× 48 0.6× 67 1.2× 40 1.1× 22 496
Hans‐Joerg Martus Switzerland 10 188 1.2× 118 0.9× 94 1.2× 18 0.3× 83 2.2× 19 357
Zhanna Sobol United States 11 98 0.6× 165 1.3× 77 1.0× 28 0.5× 26 0.7× 17 425
Mark W. Powley United States 9 147 1.0× 88 0.7× 80 1.0× 36 0.6× 16 0.4× 17 286

Countries citing papers authored by Esther Vock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Esther Vock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Esther Vock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Esther Vock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Esther Vock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Esther Vock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Esther Vock. The network helps show where Esther Vock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Esther Vock

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Esther Vock. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Esther Vock based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Esther Vock. Esther Vock is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
1.
Schieferdecker, Sebastian & Esther Vock. (2025). Quantum Chemical Evaluation and QSAR Modeling of N-Nitrosamine Carcinogenicity. Chemical Research in Toxicology. 38(2). 325–339. 6 indexed citations
2.
Snodin, David J., Alejandra Trejo‐Martin, David J. Ponting, et al.. (2024). Mechanisms of Nitrosamine Mutagenicity and Their Relationship to Rodent Carcinogenic Potency. Chemical Research in Toxicology. 37(2). 181–198. 28 indexed citations
3.
Schieferdecker, Sebastian, et al.. (2024). In Silico Prediction of Oral Acute Rodent Toxicity Using Consensus Machine Learning. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling. 64(8). 3114–3122. 4 indexed citations
4.
Bercu, Joel P., Alejandra Trejo‐Martin, Robert A. Jolly, et al.. (2023). Acceptable intakes (AIs) for 11 small molecule N-nitrosamines (NAs). Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 142. 105415–105415. 24 indexed citations
5.
Schieferdecker, Sebastian & Esther Vock. (2023). Development of Pharmacophore Models for the Important Off-Target 5-HT2B Receptor. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 66(2). 1509–1521. 4 indexed citations
6.
Schieferdecker, Sebastian, Andreas Eberlein, Esther Vock, & Mario Beilmann. (2022). Development of an in silico consensus model for the prediction of the phospholipigenic potential of small molecules. Computational Toxicology. 22. 100226–100226. 3 indexed citations
7.
Kobets, Tetyana, Jian‐Dong Duan, Esther Vock, Ulrich Deschl, & Gary M. Williams. (2022). Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals for DNA Damage in the Chicken Egg Genotoxicity Assay (CEGA). International Journal of Toxicology. 41(4). 297–311. 2 indexed citations
8.
Zeller, Andreas, Alessandro Brigo, Andreas Brink, et al.. (2019). Genotoxicity Assessment of Drug Metabolites in the Context of MIST and Beyond. Chemical Research in Toxicology. 33(1). 10–19. 9 indexed citations
9.
Kobets, Tetyana, Jian‐Dong Duan, Klaus D. Brunnemann, et al.. (2019). DNA-damaging activities of twenty-four structurally diverse unsubstituted and substituted cyclic compounds in embryo-fetal chicken livers. Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 844. 10–24. 8 indexed citations
10.
Kobets, Tetyana, Michael J. Iatropoulos, Jian‐Dong Duan, et al.. (2018). Expression of Genes Encoding for Xenobiotic Metabolism After Exposure to Dialkylnitrosamines in the Chicken Egg Genotoxicity Alternative Model. Toxicological Sciences. 166(1). 82–96. 8 indexed citations
11.
Williams, Gary M., Jian‐Dong Duan, Klaus D. Brunnemann, et al.. (2014). Chicken Fetal Liver DNA Damage and Adduct Formation by Activation-Dependent DNA-Reactive Carcinogens and Related Compounds of Several Structural Classes. Toxicological Sciences. 141(1). 18–28. 21 indexed citations
12.
Sutter, Andreas, Alexander Amberg, Scott Boyer, et al.. (2013). Use of in silico systems and expert knowledge for structure-based assessment of potentially mutagenic impurities. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 67(1). 39–52. 88 indexed citations
13.
Vock, Esther, Alan R. Wolfe, & Thomas Meehan. (2001). Trans- and cis-DNA adduct concentration in epidermis from mouse and rat skin treated ex vivo with benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide and its corresponding chlorohydrin. Mutation research. Fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis. 478(1-2). 199–206. 7 indexed citations
14.
Vock, Esther & Werner K. Lutz. (1997). Distribution and DNA adduct formation of radiolabeled methylenediphenyl-4,4′-diisocyanate (MDI) in the rat after topical treatment. Toxicology Letters. 92(2). 93–100. 16 indexed citations
15.
Vock, Esther, et al.. (1997). On the Role of DNA Double-Strand Breaks in Toxicity and Carcinogenesis. Critical Reviews in Toxicology. 27(2). 155–174. 100 indexed citations
16.
Vock, Esther, Sergio Cantoreggi, Ramesh C. Gupta, & Werner K. Lutz. (1995). 32P-postlabeling analysis of DNA adducts formed in vitro and in rat skin by methylenediphenyl-4,4'-diisocyanate (MDI). Toxicology Letters. 76(1). 17–26. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John Nicolette Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Angela White Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Medjda Bellamri Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Charlotta Fred Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Milen Todorov Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ivan D. Dobrev Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robin E. Neft Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hans‐Joerg Martus Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Zhanna Sobol Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mark W. Powley
Rankless by CCL
2026