Evelyn Mok-Lin
- Reproductive Medicine top 1%
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- James F. SmithVictor Y. FujimotoMichael S. BloomRuss HauserShelley EhrlichPaige L. WilliamsJohn C. PetrozzaAntonia M. Calafat
- Topics
- Reproductive Biology and Fertility (18 papers)Reproductive Health and Technologies (17 papers)Ovarian function and disorders (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Evelyn Mok-Lin
48 papers receiving 915 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Reproductive Medicine 461
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 324
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 295
- Social Psychology 172
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 156
Countries citing papers authored by Evelyn Mok-Lin
This map shows the geographic impact of Evelyn Mok-Lin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evelyn Mok-Lin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evelyn Mok-Lin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Evelyn Mok-Lin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Evelyn Mok-Lin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Evelyn Mok-Lin. The network helps show where Evelyn Mok-Lin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Evelyn Mok-Lin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Evelyn Mok-Lin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Evelyn Mok-Lin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Evelyn Mok-Lin. Evelyn Mok-Lin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 19 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 24 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 67 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 87 | |
| 17 | 70 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About Evelyn Mok-Lin
Evelyn Mok-Lin is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 49 papers that have together received 932 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (18 papers), Reproductive Health and Technologies (17 papers) and Ovarian function and disorders (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (461 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (324 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (80 citations). Evelyn Mok-Lin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James F. Smith, Victor Y. Fujimoto, Michael S. Bloom, Russ Hauser, Shelley Ehrlich, Paige L. Williams, John C. Petrozza, Antonia M. Calafat, Diane L. Wright and Marcelle I. Cedars. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Human Reproduction.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.