Eve Lucas
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 0.5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Food Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Eimear Nic LughadhaFiorella Fernanda MazineThaís VasconcelosFélix ForestMariana de Oliveira BüngerMark W. ChaseMarcos SobralItayguara Ribeiro da Costa
- Topics
- Plant Diversity and Evolution (107 papers)Plant and animal studies (85 papers)Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (60 papers)
- Cited by
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsEcological ModelingNature and Landscape Conservation
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- United KingdomBrazilUnited States
In The Last Decade
Eve Lucas
105 papers receiving 2.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 1.7k
- Molecular Biology 844
- Plant Science 526
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 343
- Food Science 302
Countries citing papers authored by Eve Lucas
This map shows the geographic impact of Eve Lucas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eve Lucas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eve Lucas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eve Lucas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eve Lucas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eve Lucas. The network helps show where Eve Lucas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eve Lucas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eve Lucas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eve Lucas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eve Lucas. Eve Lucas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 92 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Eve Lucas
Eve Lucas is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Ecological Modeling and Horticulture, having authored 119 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Diversity and Evolution (107 papers), Plant and animal studies (85 papers) and Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions (60 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (1.7k citations), Ecological Modeling (222 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (343 citations). Eve Lucas has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Brazil and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eimear Nic Lughadha, Fiorella Fernanda Mazine, Thaís Vasconcelos, Félix Forest, Mariana de Oliveira Bünger, Mark W. Chase, Marcos Sobral, Itayguara Ribeiro da Costa, Steven P. Bachman and Carolyn Elinore Barnes Proença. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.