Evan Walsh

527 citations
7 papers · 436 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Evan Walsh

7 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers

Evan Walsh
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 121
  • Automotive Engineering 61
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 262
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 106
  • Materials Chemistry 131
Replace Piranavan Kumaravadivel with:
Piranavan Kumaravadivel United Kingdom
Yunchao Zhang China
Haiyu Lu United States
Md. Shah Alam United States
Gabriel González Mexico
Yuxiang Tang China
Jiahao Fan China
Alexander Yulaev United States
Douglas du Boulay Japan
Chi Ho Wong Hong Kong
Evan Walsh relative to Piranavan Kumaravadivel United Kingdom Piranavan Kumaravadivel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Piranavan Kumaravadivel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Evan Walsh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Evan Walsh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Evan Walsh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Evan Walsh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Evan Walsh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Evan Walsh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Evan Walsh. The network helps show where Evan Walsh may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Evan Walsh, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Evan Walsh Line = papers co-authored together Evan Walsh links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2017134
2 2020100
3 201675
4 201768
5 201651
6 20225
7 20193

About Evan Walsh

Evan Walsh is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Molecular Biology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advancements in Battery Materials (3 papers), Advanced Battery Materials and Technologies (2 papers), Supercapacitor Materials and Fabrication (2 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (2 papers), Quantum Information and Cryptography (2 papers), Superconducting and THz Device Technology (1 paper), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (1 paper) and Graphene research and applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (121 citations), Automotive Engineering (61 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (262 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (106 citations) and Materials Chemistry (131 citations). Evan Walsh has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Steven D. Lacey, John W. Connell, Liangbing Hu, Yi Lin, Jae-Woo Kim, Kin Chung Fong, Gil‐Ho Lee, Thomas Ohki, Dmitri K. Efetov and Philip Kim. Their work appears in journals such as Nano Energy, Nature, Nano Letters, Physical Review Applied and ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact