Eva Wong

510 total citations
12 papers, 379 citations indexed

About

Eva Wong is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, Eva Wong has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 379 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 4 papers in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and 2 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in Eva Wong's work include Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (2 papers) and Color Science and Applications (2 papers). Eva Wong is often cited by papers focused on Visual perception and processing mechanisms (9 papers), Optical measurement and interference techniques (2 papers) and Color Science and Applications (2 papers). Eva Wong collaborates with scholars based in United States. Eva Wong's co-authors include Arien Mack, Naomi Weisstein, Robert Fendrich, P. L. Jain, David C. Slaughter, Hiroshi Wada, Mark A. Matthews and Kenneth A. Shackel and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance and Vision Research.

In The Last Decade

Eva Wong

11 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers

Eva Wong

CN

SP

ECP

CVPR

AE

Thomas L. Harrington United States

JJ Andriessen Netherlands

Beena Khurana United Kingdom

Marty J. Schmidt United States

Eric Sigman United States

N Yakimoff Bulgaria

Eric Hiris United States

Cigdem P. Talgar United States

Lynn D. Zimba United States

Paul Tynan United States

Thomas L. Harrington United States

Eva Wong

250 ×0.8

CN

43 ×0.6

SP

66 ×1.3

ECP

38 ×1.0

CVPR

11 ×0.4

AE

Citations per year, relative to Eva Wong Eva Wong (= 1×) peers Thomas L. Harrington

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Wong

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Wong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Wong

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Wong. The network helps show where Eva Wong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eva Wong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eva Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eva Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eva Wong. Eva Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Wong, Eva, David C. Slaughter, Hiroshi Wada, Mark A. Matthews, & Kenneth A. Shackel. (2009). Computer vision system for automated cell pressure probe operation. Biosystems Engineering. 103(2). 129–136. 5 indexed citations

2.

Wong, Eva, et al.. (1990). A Spatial and Temporal Frequency Based Figure-Ground Processor. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 1198. 459–459.

3.

Weisstein, Naomi & Eva Wong. (1987). Figure-ground organization affects the early visual processing. MIT Press eBooks. 209–230. 2 indexed citations

4.

Wong, Eva & Naomi Weisstein. (1987). The effects of flicker on the perception of figure and ground. Perception & Psychophysics. 41(5). 440–448. 14 indexed citations

5.

Wong, Eva & Naomi Weisstein. (1985). A New Visual Illusion: Flickering Fields are Localized in a Depth Plane behind Nonflickering Fields. Perception. 14(1). 13–17. 14 indexed citations

6.

Wong, Eva & Naomi Weisstein. (1984). Flicker induces depth: Spatial and temporal factors in the perceptual segregation of flickering and nonflickering regions in depth. Perception & Psychophysics. 35(3). 229–236. 21 indexed citations

7.

Wong, Eva & Naomi Weisstein. (1983). Sharp targets are detected better against a figure, and blurred targets are detected better against a background.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 9(2). 194–202. 49 indexed citations

8.

Mack, Arien, Robert Fendrich, & Eva Wong. (1982). Is perceived motion a stimulus for smooth pursuit. Vision Research. 22(1). 77–88. 45 indexed citations

9.

Wong, Eva & Naomi Weisstein. (1982). A New Perceptual Context-Superiority Effect: Line Segments Are More Visible Against a Figure Than Against a Ground. Science. 218(4572). 587–589. 58 indexed citations

10.

Wong, Eva & Arien Mack. (1981). Saccadic programming and perceived location. Acta Psychologica. 48(1-3). 123–131. 163 indexed citations

11.

Wong, Eva. (1975). Visual and Tactile Perception Reconsidered: From an Empirical-Phenomenological Perspective. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology. 6(1). 75–87. 3 indexed citations

12.

Wong, Eva & P. L. Jain. (1968). Multiple coulomb scattering of high-energy particles in nuclear emulsions. Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. A, Nuclei, particles and fields. 56(4). 922–934. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact