Eva Lenz

579 citations
23 papers · 385 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Eva Lenz

23 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers

Eva Lenz
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
  • Human-Computer Interaction 191
  • Applied Psychology 26
  • Social Psychology 95
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 42
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 21
Replace Guillaume Gronier with:
Guillaume Gronier Luxembourg
Heekyoung Jung United States
Robb Mitchell Denmark
Alethea Blackler Australia
Joep Frens Netherlands
Sven Schmutz Switzerland
Fabrice Mantelet France
Jelle van Dijk Netherlands
Claudia Núñez-Pacheco Sweden
Xipei Ren China
Eva Lenz relative to Guillaume Gronier Luxembourg Guillaume Gronier's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Guillaume Gronier · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Eva Lenz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Lenz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Lenz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Lenz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Lenz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Lenz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Lenz. The network helps show where Eva Lenz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside Eva Lenz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Eva Lenz Line = papers co-authored together Eva Lenz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Designing Moments of Meaning and Pleasure. Experience Design and Happiness
2013135
2 201043
3 201332
4 201330
5 201426
6 201314
7 201612
8 201212
9 201311
10 201711
11 201811
12 20169
13 20196
14 20196
15 20135
16
Durch schnelles Scheitern zum Erfolg: Eine Frage des passenden Prototypen?
20134
17 20194
18 20213
19 20203
20 20203

About Eva Lenz

Eva Lenz is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 23 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (11 papers), Design Education and Practice (4 papers), Influenza Virus Research Studies (3 papers), Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (3 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (3 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers) and Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (191 citations), Applied Psychology (26 citations), Social Psychology (95 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (42 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (21 citations). Eva Lenz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Egypt and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marc Hassenzahl, Sarah Diefenbach, Matthias Laschke, Kai Eckoldt, Joonhwan Kim, Stephan Pleschka, Zhongfang Wang, Ervin Fodor, Nicole C. Robb and Thorsten Wolff. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Virology, The Journal of Positive Psychology, Assessment, Neuropsychologia and Language Resources and Evaluation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact