Eugene M. Fodor
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Robert J. HouseJames WoyckeDana L. FarrowKeegan D. GreenierTerry L. SmithNicole E. Conroy
- Topics
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (9 papers)Psychological Testing and Assessment (6 papers)Psychological and Educational Research Studies (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyJournal of Applied PsychologyPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Eugene M. Fodor
33 papers receiving 565 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 72
- Social Psychology 269
- Sociology and Political Science 214
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 165
- Clinical Psychology 147
- Applied Psychology 136
Countries citing papers authored by Eugene M. Fodor
This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene M. Fodor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene M. Fodor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene M. Fodor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eugene M. Fodor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene M. Fodor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene M. Fodor. The network helps show where Eugene M. Fodor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eugene M. Fodor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eugene M. Fodor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eugene M. Fodor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eugene M. Fodor. Eugene M. Fodor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 58 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | Charismatic and noncharismatic leaders: Differences in behavior and effectiveness. | 54 |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 48 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Eugene M. Fodor
Eugene M. Fodor is a scholar working on General Psychology, Applied Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 35 papers that have together received 669 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (9 papers), Psychological Testing and Assessment (6 papers) and Psychological and Educational Research Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (36 citations), Applied Psychology (136 citations) and Social Psychology (269 citations). Eugene M. Fodor has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert J. House, James Woycke, Dana L. Farrow, Keegan D. Greenier, Terry L. Smith and Nicole E. Conroy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Applied Psychology and Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.