Eugene M. Emme
-
- International Law and Aviation 2
- Military History and Strategy 2
-
- Space exploration and regulation 12
- Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life 5
- History and Developments in Astronomy 4
- Planetary Science and Exploration 2
-
- Space Exploration and Technology 7
- Rocket and propulsion systems research 4
- Co-authors
- Robert E. OsgoodTheodore RoppGeorge H. QuesterW. Phillips DavisonRobert GoddardAlison I. GriffithWalter R. CunninghamВ. В. Лебедев
- Cited by
- Political Science and International RelationsAstronomy and AstrophysicsHistory and Philosophy of Science
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Eugene M. Emme
28 papers receiving 114 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Political Science and International Relations 90
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 38
- History and Philosophy of Science 10
- Aerospace Engineering 27
- General Energy 1
Countries citing papers authored by Eugene M. Emme
This map shows the geographic impact of Eugene M. Emme's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugene M. Emme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugene M. Emme more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eugene M. Emme
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugene M. Emme. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugene M. Emme. The network helps show where Eugene M. Emme may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 11 scholars most cited alongside Eugene M. Emme, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | Astronautics and Aeronautics, 1964: Chronology on Science, Technology, and Policy | 2013 | 0 |
| 3 | 1973 | 19 | |
| 4 | 1971 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1970 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1968 | 13 | |
| 7 | 1967 | 12 | |
| 8 | A history of space flight | 1965 | 4 |
| 9 | 1963 | 5 | |
| 10 | 1963 | 0 | |
| 11 | 1962 | 2 | |
| 12 | 1961 | 0 | |
| 13 | 1961 | 15 | |
| 14 | 1961 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1961 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1959 | 7 | |
| 17 | 1958 | 31 | |
| 18 | 1957 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1957 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1955 | 1 |
About Eugene M. Emme
Eugene M. Emme is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, History and Philosophy of Science and Aerospace Engineering, having authored 39 papers that have together received 180 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Space exploration and regulation (12 papers), Space Exploration and Technology (7 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (5 papers), History and Developments in Astronomy (4 papers), Rocket and propulsion systems research (4 papers), International Law and Aviation (2 papers), Military History and Strategy (2 papers) and Planetary Science and Exploration (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (90 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (38 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (10 citations). Eugene M. Emme has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert E. Osgood, Theodore Ropp, George H. Quester, W. Phillips Davison, Robert Goddard, Alison I. Griffith, Walter R. Cunningham, В. В. Лебедев, F. W. Anderson and Hannah M. Horowitz.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.