Eugen Kludt

598 total citations
29 papers, 426 citations indexed

About

Eugen Kludt is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems and Otorhinolaryngology. According to data from OpenAlex, Eugen Kludt has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 426 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 21 papers in Sensory Systems and 12 papers in Otorhinolaryngology. Recurrent topics in Eugen Kludt's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (22 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (15 papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (12 papers). Eugen Kludt is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (22 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (15 papers) and Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (12 papers). Eugen Kludt collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Australia and United States. Eugen Kludt's co-authors include Detlev Schild, Stephan Junek, Fred Wolf, Andreas Büchner, Thomas Lenarz, H. Maier, Angelika Illg, Mareike Finke, Antonio Jimeno Yepes and Burkard Schwab and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Neuron and Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Eugen Kludt

28 papers receiving 420 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Eugen Kludt Germany 10 262 260 136 93 89 29 426
Natalie A. Hardie Australia 11 417 1.6× 436 1.7× 97 0.7× 81 0.9× 27 0.3× 12 603
Cameron L. Budenz United States 10 372 1.4× 390 1.5× 57 0.4× 169 1.8× 69 0.8× 13 536
Olga Stakhovskaya United States 14 594 2.3× 693 2.7× 108 0.8× 300 3.2× 80 0.9× 28 853
Jonathon P. Whitton United States 8 446 1.7× 518 2.0× 34 0.3× 209 2.2× 41 0.5× 9 636
Г А Таварткиладзе Russia 11 315 1.2× 239 0.9× 17 0.1× 74 0.8× 57 0.6× 67 456
Ning Hu United States 13 372 1.4× 378 1.5× 63 0.5× 68 0.7× 22 0.2× 15 463
R. J. Mount Canada 11 270 1.0× 322 1.2× 26 0.2× 51 0.5× 35 0.4× 19 449
Keli Cao China 9 394 1.5× 673 2.6× 37 0.3× 196 2.1× 69 0.8× 39 812
Patricia G. Trautwein United States 9 453 1.7× 449 1.7× 17 0.1× 97 1.0× 50 0.6× 16 558
Theodore J. Glattke United States 16 556 2.1× 520 2.0× 22 0.2× 146 1.6× 120 1.3× 33 713

Countries citing papers authored by Eugen Kludt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Eugen Kludt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eugen Kludt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eugen Kludt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Eugen Kludt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eugen Kludt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eugen Kludt. The network helps show where Eugen Kludt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eugen Kludt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eugen Kludt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eugen Kludt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eugen Kludt. Eugen Kludt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Salcher, Rolf, Eugen Kludt, Anke Lesinski‐Schiedat, et al.. (2024). Long-term experience with biohybrid cochlear implants in human neurosensory restoration. Cochlear Implants International. 25(3). 1–11.
3.
ShafieiBavani, Elaheh, Benjamin Goudey, Isabell Kiral-Kornek, et al.. (2021). Predictive models for cochlear implant outcomes: Performance, generalizability, and the impact of cohort size. Trends in Hearing. 25. 1851379518–1851379518. 33 indexed citations
4.
Kludt, Eugen, Waldo Nogueira, Thomas Lenarz, & Andreas Buechner. (2021). A sound coding strategy based on a temporal masking model for cochlear implants. PLoS ONE. 16(1). e0244433–e0244433. 5 indexed citations
5.
Goudey, Benjamin, Kerrie Plant, Isabell Kiral-Kornek, et al.. (2021). A MultiCenter Analysis of Factors Associated with Hearing Outcome for 2,735 Adults with Cochlear Implants. Trends in Hearing. 25. 1851350869–1851350869. 56 indexed citations
6.
Degen, Chantal, Andreas Büchner, Eugen Kludt, & Thomas Lenarz. (2020). Effect of Electrode to Modiolus Distance on Electrophysiological and Psychophysical Parameters in CI Patients With Perimodiolar and Lateral Electrode Arrays. Otology & Neurotology. 41(9). e1091–e1097. 17 indexed citations
7.
Snik, A.F.M., et al.. (2020). Hearing Aid Treatment for Patients with Mixed Hearing Loss. Part II: Speech Recognition in Comparison to Direct Acoustic Cochlear Stimulation. Audiology and Neurotology. 25(3). 133–142. 8 indexed citations
8.
Finke, Mareike, et al.. (2017). Speech intelligibility and subjective benefit in single-sided deaf adults after cochlear implantation. Hearing Research. 348. 112–119. 40 indexed citations
9.
Kludt, Eugen, et al.. (2017). Clinical Validation of a Sound Processor Upgrade in Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant Subjects. Otology & Neurotology. 38(5). 655–661. 4 indexed citations
10.
11.
Kludt, Eugen, Andreas Büchner, Burkard Schwab, Thomas Lenarz, & H. Maier. (2016). Indication of direct acoustical cochlea stimulation in comparison to cochlear implants. Hearing Research. 340. 185–190. 13 indexed citations
12.
Schwab, Burkard, Eugen Kludt, H. Maier, Thomas Lenarz, & M. Teschner. (2015). Subtotal petrosectomy and Codacs™: new possibilities in ears with chronic infection. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology. 273(6). 1387–1391. 11 indexed citations
13.
Kludt, Eugen, et al.. (2015). Integrating Temperature with Odor Processing in the Olfactory Bulb. Journal of Neuroscience. 35(20). 7892–7902. 14 indexed citations
14.
Kludt, Eugen, et al.. (2015). Stimulating on multiple electrodes can improve temporal pitch perception. International Journal of Audiology. 54(6). 376–383. 6 indexed citations
15.
Lenarz, Thomas, Burkard Schwab, H. Maier, & Eugen Kludt. (2014). Direkte akustische cochleäre Stimulation für die Therapie der hochgradigen kombinierten Schwerhörigkeit. HNO. 62(7). 481–489. 8 indexed citations
16.
Lenarz, Thomas, Nicolas Verhaert, Christian Desloovere, et al.. (2014). A Comparative Study on Speech in Noise Understanding with a Direct Acoustic Cochlear Implant in Subjects with Severe to Profound Mixed Hearing Loss. Audiology and Neurotology. 19(3). 164–174. 23 indexed citations
17.
Kludt, Eugen, et al.. (2014). Perception of Polyphony With Cochlear Implants for 2 and 3 Simultaneous Pitches. Otology & Neurotology. 35(3). 431–436. 5 indexed citations
18.
Syed, Adnan, Eugen Kludt, Evangelia Tantalaki, et al.. (2012). Bimodal processing of olfactory information in an amphibian nose: odor responses segregate into a medial and a lateral stream. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 70(11). 1965–1984. 41 indexed citations
19.
Kludt, Eugen, et al.. (2011). The Styryl Dye FM1-43 Suppresses Odorant Responses in a Subset of Olfactory Neurons by Blocking Cyclic Nucleotide-gated (CNG) Channels. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 286(32). 28041–28048. 3 indexed citations
20.
Junek, Stephan, Eugen Kludt, Fred Wolf, & Detlev Schild. (2010). Olfactory Coding with Patterns of Response Latencies. Neuron. 67(5). 872–884. 101 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026