Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to Étienne Wenger Étienne Wenger (= 1×)
peers
Jean Lave
Countries citing papers authored by Étienne Wenger
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Étienne Wenger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Étienne Wenger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Étienne Wenger more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Étienne Wenger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Étienne Wenger. The network helps show where Étienne Wenger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Étienne Wenger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Étienne Wenger.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Étienne Wenger based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Étienne Wenger. Étienne Wenger is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wenger, Étienne, Beverly Trayner, & Maarten de Laat. (2011). Promoting and assessing value creation in communities and networks: a conceptual framework. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).350 indexed citations
Wenger, Étienne. (2010). Developing complex capabilities: the case of disaster risk reduction. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).1 indexed citations
7.
Wenger, Étienne, Nancy White, & John David Smith. (2009). Digital Habitats : Stewarding technology for communities. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).364 indexed citations
8.
Wenger, Étienne. (2009). Social Learning Capacity: Four Essays on Innovation and Learning in Social Systems. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 193–210.4 indexed citations
9.
Wenger, Étienne. (2008). Practice-based professional learning: perspectives from social learning theory. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).3 indexed citations
Huysman, Marleen, Étienne Wenger, & Volker Wulf. (2003). Communities and technologies : proceedings of the First International Conference on Communities and Technologies : C&T 2003. Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks.18 indexed citations
13.
Huysman, Marleen, Étienne Wenger, & Volker Wulf. (2003). Communities and Technologies. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research).87 indexed citations
Wenger, Étienne, et al.. (2001). Comunidades de práctica. Aprendizaje, significado e identidad. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).150 indexed citations
16.
Wenger, Étienne. (2000). Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems. Organization. 7(2). 225–246.2457 indexed citations breakdown →
17.
Wenger, Étienne. (1998). Communities of Practice. Cambridge University Press eBooks.12957 indexed citations breakdown →
Lave, Jean & Étienne Wenger. (1991). Situated Learning. Cambridge University Press eBooks.19408 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Wenger, Étienne. (1988). Artificial intelligence and tutoring systems: Computational and cognitive approaches to the communication of knowledge. Knowledge-Based Systems. 1(5). 311–311.515 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.