Ethan M. Clement

710 citations
22 papers · 571 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Ethan M. Clement

21 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers

Ethan M. Clement
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Ophthalmology 86
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 191
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 99
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 17
  • Biological Psychiatry 11
Replace João José Lachat with:
João José Lachat Brazil
Kathryn Crawford United States
Lian Cui South Korea
Diana Tănase United States
Xiaoyan Ma China
Arto Palkama Finland
Maria Tilde Torracca Italy
Daniel J. Brown Australia
Shoichi Asano Japan
Kyung Hoon Lee South Korea
Ethan M. Clement relative to João José Lachat Brazil João José Lachat's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
João José Lachat · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ethan M. Clement

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ethan M. Clement's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ethan M. Clement with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ethan M. Clement more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ethan M. Clement

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ethan M. Clement. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ethan M. Clement. The network helps show where Ethan M. Clement may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ethan M. Clement, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ethan M. Clement Line = papers co-authored together Ethan M. Clement links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2 20232
3 202114
4 202063
5 20198
6 20187
7 2010248
8 200230
9 199813
10 199847
11 199810
12 199624
13 19860
14 198516
15 19837
16
[Comparative bioavailability of two forms of spironolactone. Rationalization applied to dosage (author's transl)].
198111
17 198014
18 19797
19 197812
20 19771

About Ethan M. Clement

Ethan M. Clement is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Reproductive Medicine and Sensory Systems, having authored 22 papers that have together received 571 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (2 papers), Migraine and Headache Studies (2 papers) and Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (86 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (191 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (99 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (17 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (11 citations). Ethan M. Clement has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include George W. Kidder, J. Odontiadis, A. Scott McCall, Gary W. Conrad, Stefan Kraft, Henry F. Edelhauser, Michael Franklin, R. Strang, P. C. B. MacKinnon and Young‐Jin Kang. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropharmacology, Journal of Endocrinology, Experimental Neurology, Neuroscience and Molecular Cell.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026