et al

3.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
20 papers, 3.0k citations indexed

About

et al is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Applied Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, et al has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 3.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Clinical Psychology, 6 papers in Applied Psychology and 4 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in et al's work include Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) et al is often cited by papers focused on Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (3 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers) et al collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany et al's co-authors include Bonnie S. Dansky, Dean G. Kilpatrick, Heidi S. Resnick, Edward B. Blanchard, Anne E. Kazak, Dimitri Christakis, Lamia P. Barakat, Kathleen Meeske, Gerald R. Adams and Stephen W. Raudenbush and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.

In The Last Decade

et al

20 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Hit Papers

Prevalence of civilian trauma and posttraumatic stress di... 1993 2026 2004 2015 1993 400 800 1.2k

Peers

et al
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Clinical Psychology 1.9k
  • Sociology and Political Science 529
  • Social Psychology 453
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 434
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 366
Replace Elizabeth M. Ridder with:
Elizabeth M. Ridder New Zealand
Michelle E. Feldman United States
Jeffrey Foote United States
Meyer D. Glantz United States
Yuko Miyake Japan
Christine Maguth Nezu United States
Laurie Cashman United States
Jeanne S. Ruggiero United States
Diane E. Sholomskas United States
Bonnie S. Dansky United States
Elizabeth M. Ridder New Zealand View profile →
Citations per field, relative to et al
et al · 1×
Citations per year, relative to et al
et al · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by et al

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of et al's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by et al with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites et al more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by et al

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by et al. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by et al. The network helps show where et al may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of et al

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of et al. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of et al based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with et al. et al is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 335
2 68
3 100
4 94
5 79
6 93
7 145
8 114
9 24
10
Prevalence of civilian trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder in a representative national sample of women. breakdown →
1350
11 127
12 22
13 54
14 11
15 42
16 96
17 28
18 90
19 61
20 114

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026